How are all the millions/billions paid to the Telecoms for new FTH working out?
A one year payback would have investors fighting to throw money at you.
There are several laws/regulations that will ensure you free room and board at a Federal Detention Facility. The list is to long to post here but here's a link to it/them (There's more than one).
"RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) is a public-key cryptosystem that is widely used for secure data transmission. It is also one of the oldest. The acronym RSA comes from the surnames of Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman, who publicly described the algorithm in 1977" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_(cryptosystem)
First off, there is no such thing as Copyright patents.
Next, Copyright became automatic 1 Jan 1978, 43 years ago. This post is copyrighted as soon as I post it.
And I'm not going to get involved in attempting to explain FRAND licensing to you.
The Firearms Industry has a law similar to sec 230 that prohibits people suing the individual companies over the actions of third parties, and just like sec 230 people are continuously trying to revoke that law.
Maybe it's something in the water?
If you can't understand the following and why you are wrong, then I'm sure someone will explain.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Constitution explains what the government can and can't do, not the people.
And the Judicial branch is part of the Government.
After reading the first paragraph I was ready to flag you. After reading the second paragraph I realized that I was honored to read probably the epitome of sarcasm. My hat's off to you sir/madame!
I remember when that act was passed. It was passed due to a documented conspiracy between several large cities and several anti-gun groups.Their plan was to sue every gun manufacturer in the country into bankruptcy and sue again until there were no guns being manufactured in this country. According to them the only reason for manufacturing guns is to kill people, although my guns have killed a few squirrels, rabbits, coyotes, and paper, to the best of my knowledge never any people. Thanks to a idiot judge in Connecticut that decided the PLCAA didn't apply Remington is history.
The AC is correct, this being one of the rare times that Stephen T. Stone is incorrect.
"The Electoral College invalidated more than 2 million votes in 2016" is wrong, the Electoral College deals only with Electoral Ballots, and there are only 538 of them.
More at the link:
Really? Are you saying the Boogaloo groups are not conservatives? How about the Proud Boys? White Supremacists? How about the kid from Illinois that traveled to Kenosha Wisconsin to shoot protesters? His defense is paid for by conservatives with enough money to pay the best lawyers in the country.
"It's conservatives setting off explosives and starting fires across America these past four months..." FTFY
From your link: "Conclusions This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. "
A study comparing cloth masks to medical masks determines that medical masks are more effective. Imagine that.
You said "Facebook tossed a good friend of mine for a month for linking to a peer-reviewed, double-blind study with a control group showing the ineffectiveness of masks."
Lie much?
IC 35-43-4-3 Version a
Conversion:
Sec. 3. (a) A person who knowingly or intentionally exerts
unauthorized control over property of another person commits
criminal conversion, a Class A misdemeanor.
In Indiana anyway. 2014 version so might have been changed/updated since then.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Are you suggesting it's just a parasite sucking the life out of a woman's body?
I've never heard of that theory before now.
(untitled comment)
How are all the millions/billions paid to the Telecoms for new FTH working out?
A one year payback would have investors fighting to throw money at you.
Re: Re: Re: In other words
There are several laws/regulations that will ensure you free room and board at a Federal Detention Facility. The list is to long to post here but here's a link to it/them (There's more than one).
https://research.ncsu.edu/administration/compliance/research-compliance/export-controls/export -controlled-items/
Re: "standardization of weakened encryption by the RSA"
The third result when doing a search for RSA.
"RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) is a public-key cryptosystem that is widely used for secure data transmission. It is also one of the oldest. The acronym RSA comes from the surnames of Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman, who publicly described the algorithm in 1977"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_(cryptosystem)
For even more detail about the problem see; https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nsa-nist-encryption-scandal/
Re:
First off, there is no such thing as Copyright patents.
Next, Copyright became automatic 1 Jan 1978, 43 years ago. This post is copyrighted as soon as I post it.
And I'm not going to get involved in attempting to explain FRAND licensing to you.
A whole wall of words that mean nothing.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature, Not A Bug
The Firearms Industry has a law similar to sec 230 that prohibits people suing the individual companies over the actions of third parties, and just like sec 230 people are continuously trying to revoke that law.
Maybe it's something in the water?
And one more Re in the subject line
Facts now in evidence
Is CNN acceptable? https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/22/politics/donald-trump-alabama-nfl
If not then take your pick from the following Google link https://www.google.com/search?q=45+suggest+the+NFL+should+fire+Colin+Kaepernick+and+other+players+wh o+protested+against+police+brutality+because+those+players+took+a+knee+during+the+National+Anthem%3F &oq=45+suggest+the+NFL+should+fire+Colin+Kaepernick+and+other+players+who+protested+against+poli ce+brutality+because+those+players+took+a+knee+during+the+National+Anthem%3F&aqs=chrome..69i57&a mp;sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Re: Re: Is this wrong?
Go find a Civics textbook, since apparently you have no knowledge of how the Federal Government works.
Re: Is this wrong?
If you can't understand the following and why you are wrong, then I'm sure someone will explain.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Constitution explains what the government can and can't do, not the people.
And the Judicial branch is part of the Government.
Re: Re:
After reading the first paragraph I was ready to flag you. After reading the second paragraph I realized that I was honored to read probably the epitome of sarcasm. My hat's off to you sir/madame!
(untitled comment)
Here is another one from Indiana
https://www.wthr.com/article/news/investigations/13-investigates/13-investigates-department- of-child-services-dcs-falsified-drug-test-parents-children/531-b718d663-1b8c-4244-b4ff-d934c34bb549
Is it something in the water??
"According to DCS, the problems are linked to Tomo, a drug screen company based in Missouri, with a local office in Indianapolis."
PLCAA
I remember when that act was passed. It was passed due to a documented conspiracy between several large cities and several anti-gun groups.Their plan was to sue every gun manufacturer in the country into bankruptcy and sue again until there were no guns being manufactured in this country. According to them the only reason for manufacturing guns is to kill people, although my guns have killed a few squirrels, rabbits, coyotes, and paper, to the best of my knowledge never any people. Thanks to a idiot judge in Connecticut that decided the PLCAA didn't apply Remington is history.
No comparison.
Re:
Google was no help, so perhaps you can tell me what are "non political appointees"??
Re: Re: Re:
The AC is correct, this being one of the rare times that Stephen T. Stone is incorrect.
"The Electoral College invalidated more than 2 million votes in 2016" is wrong, the Electoral College deals only with Electoral Ballots, and there are only 538 of them.
More at the link:
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/the-electoral-college.aspx
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Why do you bother to make such ridiculous claims that are so easily disapproved?
Supporters page:
https://www.csis.org/programs/support/securing-our-future/supporters
They also have a separate page for government support if you could be bothered to look.
Your entire post is 100% BS
Re: Re: Re: Not conservatives
Really? Are you saying the Boogaloo groups are not conservatives? How about the Proud Boys? White Supremacists? How about the kid from Illinois that traveled to Kenosha Wisconsin to shoot protesters? His defense is paid for by conservatives with enough money to pay the best lawyers in the country.
"It's conservatives setting off explosives and starting fires across America these past four months..." FTFY
Re: re:
I think you would be more at home in China or some other authoritarian state, in this country the Feds can only enforce Fed Law not local laws.
Also, you would lose your bet, Me and mine will protect ourselves, I'll call the local cops to pick up the bodies afterwards
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The point of free speech
From your link: "Conclusions This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. "
A study comparing cloth masks to medical masks determines that medical masks are more effective. Imagine that.
You said "Facebook tossed a good friend of mine for a month for linking to a peer-reviewed, double-blind study with a control group showing the ineffectiveness of masks."
Lie much?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
List of 49 viral vaccines: https://www.drugs.com/drug-class/viral-vaccines.html
But you don't care because you're a troll, so I flagged all your comments.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
IC 35-43-4-3 Version a
Conversion:
Sec. 3. (a) A person who knowingly or intentionally exerts
unauthorized control over property of another person commits
criminal conversion, a Class A misdemeanor.
In Indiana anyway. 2014 version so might have been changed/updated since then.
More comments from steell >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by steell.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt