Why is it that you went after that statement and nothing else either of us said?
the rest of the wall of text was irrelevant because meshpage has already been properly implemented. There isn't any coding to do any longer when the technology exists and have been tweaked to bugfree status. This kinda makes all your recommendations on how to implement the code better irrelevant...
Never mind the fact that you yourself acknowledged that Meshpage has all of several hundred users at best, who to your knowledge have yet to do anything with it.
This is still better than what you've managed to do.
This lazy label he got when he decided that he doesn't need to create anything of his own, simply because blender already exists. Bastard label is just obvious to everyone who isn't blind.
> so any money he receives has no equivalent work product.
This doesn’t follow from the aforementioned premise.
This conclusion comes from the fact that when he does not create anything of his own, his work effort that he uses to advance the society is at lower level than any ordinary person who have decided to help government keep their society up and running.
> When this happens, we call it fraud.
Fraud requires some level of deceit or misinformation.
This deceit and misinformation you'll get when he subscribes to his salaru and demands compensation level that isn't grounded by the work amount that he's doing. I.e. the key issue is that other people are working harder and still he thinks he's entitled to higher salary simply for his beautyful face.
sell their organs on the black market to appease your copyright settlement fees.
Guess we're going to see this happen too when russia invaded ukraine. Guess my prediction turned true, although in such way that you didn't recognize it as a prediction. But all my games are prediction of something.
We don’t need to make fifth-rate Blender ripoffs when Blender already exists.
So, you're just lazy. Instead of creating a solution of your own, you rely on materials created by other people. This isn't much better than copyright infringement, given that you never planned to pass any money to the authors.
In fact, this free software crap is creating market where legimate content authors have difficulties asking for money when free (as beer) solutions are available.
While free software foundation is adverticing their "free as freedom" solutions, what they're actually selling is free beer. This is always a mistake.
especially not after you make claims such as you have a human-to-robot automatic conversion plan
claims don't matter. Getting stuff done matters. I've proven (with my website) that I can get technologies done. All the other people in techdirt has nothing like that to show off...
Putting it on itch.io for maybe several hundred free downloads is not a sound business strategy, but you knew that already.
At least its available to real customers. It's just customer's own problem if they fail to use the material. I.e. our software releases are well executed and available for customers.
99% of projects never get to the stage where their releases are available to customers.
They paid for, or received a legal copy of the movie to evaluate
This isn't enough. The normal end-user license for a movie only allows user to watch the movie. It does not have permission to create derived works. The reviewer is clearly creating derived works, especially if they use clips from the movie itself.
You're the one who regularly whines that Blender is a competitor who unfairly gets all the business, a
You're the one who thinks blender is meshpage competitor. That simply isn't true. Blender simply cannot put the 3d models to a web page, so it's not a competitor.
You made a claim. You have to back it up. If you can’t, you’re full of shit.
I'm more reliable source for the information, given that I worked with the project. Wikipedia is all 2nd hand information which has tidbits like "their organisation was soviet like arrangement"... which is completely bullshit informatiion....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
the rest of the wall of text was irrelevant because meshpage has already been properly implemented. There isn't any coding to do any longer when the technology exists and have been tweaked to bugfree status. This kinda makes all your recommendations on how to implement the code better irrelevant...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
This is still better than what you've managed to do.
Re: Re: Re:
This lazy label he got when he decided that he doesn't need to create anything of his own, simply because blender already exists. Bastard label is just obvious to everyone who isn't blind.
This conclusion comes from the fact that when he does not create anything of his own, his work effort that he uses to advance the society is at lower level than any ordinary person who have decided to help government keep their society up and running.
This deceit and misinformation you'll get when he subscribes to his salaru and demands compensation level that isn't grounded by the work amount that he's doing. I.e. the key issue is that other people are working harder and still he thinks he's entitled to higher salary simply for his beautyful face.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It was already proven that users of copyrighted works cannot rely on fair use to save their ass from copyright infringement lawsuit.
Re:
he obvously is lazy bastard so any money he receives has no equivalent work product. When this happens, we call it fraud.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So you're a fraud who ripoffs his employer too?
Re: Re: Re:
Guess we're going to see this happen too when russia invaded ukraine. Guess my prediction turned true, although in such way that you didn't recognize it as a prediction. But all my games are prediction of something.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I think it's more suspect what you're doing -- i.e. when you're lazy bastard who gets nothing done, it's significantly more suspect.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
How many times you've detected my software release to be broken?
Re: Re: Re:
So this proves my position that users of copyrighted works cannot rely on fair use to save their ass from copyright infringement lawsuit.
Re:
So, you're just lazy. Instead of creating a solution of your own, you rely on materials created by other people. This isn't much better than copyright infringement, given that you never planned to pass any money to the authors.
In fact, this free software crap is creating market where legimate content authors have difficulties asking for money when free (as beer) solutions are available.
While free software foundation is adverticing their "free as freedom" solutions, what they're actually selling is free beer. This is always a mistake.
Re: Re: Re:
claims don't matter. Getting stuff done matters. I've proven (with my website) that I can get technologies done. All the other people in techdirt has nothing like that to show off...
Re:
It's enough that the copyright violators learn to live 8 years with $48 money. It's a challenge for them, and many will die while trying it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
At least its available to real customers. It's just customer's own problem if they fail to use the material. I.e. our software releases are well executed and available for customers.
99% of projects never get to the stage where their releases are available to customers.
Re: Re:
This isn't enough. The normal end-user license for a movie only allows user to watch the movie. It does not have permission to create derived works. The reviewer is clearly creating derived works, especially if they use clips from the movie itself.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You're the one who thinks blender is meshpage competitor. That simply isn't true. Blender simply cannot put the 3d models to a web page, so it's not a competitor.
Re:
Since the video is available via the url above, you don't need to rely on the review by the teenagers when you can see my video directly yourself.
Re:
I'm more reliable source for the information, given that I worked with the project. Wikipedia is all 2nd hand information which has tidbits like "their organisation was soviet like arrangement"... which is completely bullshit informatiion....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
google.poly -- discontinued
sketchfab -- actual code under paywall
cgsociety.org -- software nowhere to be found
poly.pizza -- software not available
That's all the competitors to meshpage... which one you think has their code available?
Re:
how would they know i'm an asshole before actually contacting me? They simply have no way to know...
More comments from tp >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by tp.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt