We all have a brain to use as a filter for trolling and disinformation.
As long as I check for sources, as see Facebook as the best news aggregator. And platforms like Facebook limit problems that were before, like exposure, fragmentation and yes, spam.
Platforms like Facebook may have the censorship problem, but as a simple news aggregator, I don't miss email lists (or the giant spam folder, leaking into the inbox)
PS: When I say news, I don't mean CNN like news, but ArsTechnica like news, so censorship is not a problem here.
The EULA says (somewhere) that you bought the right to use the game. They own the game itself, so they decide when to revoke that right. Sorry, no refunds. Have fun playing.
They can just block the site, which is bad as it is. And seeing how Kim Dotcom is on trial by the US without ever being in the US (as an entity or as a person), everything is possible.
You're not saying that people used to share hard drives, floppies, tapes, scrolls, stones, etc? Only the big bad internet is to blame. If they stop connection sharing, all piracy will grind to a halt.
Article 13 might take techdirt out of europe. This will hurt both techdirt and it's readers. And why? Because some people want more money. Why should Mike be paid by someone when he's only talking about censorship.
Re:
We all have a brain to use as a filter for trolling and disinformation.
As long as I check for sources, as see Facebook as the best news aggregator. And platforms like Facebook limit problems that were before, like exposure, fragmentation and yes, spam.
/div>Platforms like Facebook may have the censorship problem, but as a simple news aggregator, I don't miss email lists (or the giant spam folder, leaking into the inbox)
PS: When I say news, I don't mean CNN like news, but ArsTechnica like news, so censorship is not a problem here.
Re: Option C
The EULA says (somewhere) that you bought the right to use the game. They own the game itself, so they decide when to revoke that right. Sorry, no refunds. Have fun playing.
/div>Re: Stick to tech
A politician abusing technology is not relevant here? Is a British politician different from a regular politician?
/div>Re: '... who?'
To realize those benefits, one needs forward thinking (and less greed).
/div>Re: Re: Re:
They can just block the site, which is bad as it is. And seeing how Kim Dotcom is on trial by the US without ever being in the US (as an entity or as a person), everything is possible.
/div>Re: Re: So you say Boris Johnson is wrong:
Probably on the same idea fueling those revolutionary two articles.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The only question: Who bought them and how c
You're not saying that people used to share hard drives, floppies, tapes, scrolls, stones, etc? Only the big bad internet is to blame. If they stop connection sharing, all piracy will grind to a halt.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I’m not laughing with you, I’m l
A gentlemen's word needs no citation. Also, Google is the root of all evil. By default, they must be lying.
/div>Re:
Article 13 might take techdirt out of europe. This will hurt both techdirt and it's readers. And why? Because some people want more money. Why should Mike be paid by someone when he's only talking about censorship.
/div>Re: Re:
They should start testing their geoblocking now to be article 13 ready. That should give us europeans a taste of tomorrow.
/div>Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by tex2us.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt