Without notice of sources and methods and strained interpretations of laws that are never made available to arrestees.......plea bargains are expedient and promoted by county, state, and federal prosecutors.
Imagine what it costs to litigate civil liberties....and what do you accomplish when badges-prosecutors-judges do not and will not police themselves or any other police state actor????!!!!!
Exposure in the form of litigation......is not a prosecution resulting in jail.
In 1986, the Patriot act and EIT were used on me to run Operation Slammer .......and...no US ATTY or FBI agent in Sioux Falls, SD,...ever...ever...ever conducted a prelim inquiry into my allegations after FBI HQ and FBI OPR had access to my DOJ OIG complaint?!!!
The problem is not bad law.....it's bad police state actors who will not uphold their fiduciary duty./div>
HLS made a press statement that "championing civil rits" makes you a terrorist suspect.....thus......your rights can and will be secretly subverted by police state actors./div>
Secret DOJ memos hiding strained interpretations of "void for vagueness" enabling laws.
Everything is a secret.....you have to piece together the policy from statements made by police state enablers....and guess correctly what the secret policy and practices are with no access to any definitive statement or challenge of practices that are hidden after arrest and charges are litigated./div>
It's called "The Hand Off Method" of illegally laundering and disseminating illegally obtained info: I know because it was done to me and Dr Mark Gordon to make misdemeanor arrests and plea bargains by SFPd and Minnehaha Cty States Attorneys.
Hiding the sources and methods was rationalized by the bogus assertion "state secrets" on a global battlefield.
I put this in my first DOJ OIG complaint that Glen Fine and FBI HQ obstructed.
Entrapment was always used by overzealous cops and prosecutors...so, uh...hmmmm...why legalize it?
With entrapment...Brady Ruling still applies...but, ahem...whose gonna prosecute the prosecutors at the county, state, and fed levels when they join conspiracies to entrap (what does that mean?) while also refusing to admit "just exactly how did they entrap someone"?
"Entrapment" was legalized but not defined so that a "good faith defense" existed so that prosecutors did not have to investigate or file charges for outrageous civil rights violations in which "CIA Non Consensual Experimentation" could focus on "mind control" and "subliminal programming" as part of Operation Slammer.
Go ask FBI HQ what they know about being briefed on Operation Slammer by whistleblower Julianne McKinney?/div>
Prosecutors in Sioux Falls, SD, at the county, state, and federal levels all joined a conspiracy to violate the federal and state criminal codes when they aided and abetted The NSA TSP contract surveillance directed at me, Dr Mark Gordon, Rich Gordon (murdered), John Kabieseman (murdered), YPD Sgt Mark Defenbaugh (murdered), SD US Sen Tim Johnson and his Sioux FAlls Office staff (Johnson brain stroked with DEW), Omaha attorney Leroy Rogers (brain stroked with DEW), and others.
It's all in my second US DOJ Civil Rights complaint...that Holder and James Comey known about...but will not investigate or even conduct a five minute interview?/div>
I get the feeling that our NSA Apologist...did not read the law (like Congress did not read or understand what they were voting on).
No matter what.....the written laws don't matter if you don't have actual and explicit notice of "who, what, when, why, and how" to satisfy Fed Judges demanding that a litigant prove standing (party in interest, actual harm analysis).
How can anyone challenge NCTC and FBI-CIA assassinations of my known associates....when it's all "state secrets" used to protect "sources and methods"????/div>
You have to understand that anyone deemed a terrorist is no longer considered a US citizen (citizenship is stripped unilaterally and extra judicially).
Since terrorists "aiding and abetting Al Qaeda" on a global battlefield without limitations...are not US citizens any more (citizenship taken away secretly and covertly)...therefore...THE NSA DOES NOT MONITOR OR SURVEIL US CITIZENS.
You have to follow the press releases...and put the puzzle together because the logic is so strained that NSA apologists are afraid to "give up the scam" to prevent notice required to challenge the policy and practices in Fed courts./div>
I wrote the complaint that landed near enough to Thomas Tamm at DOJ HQ, to rip open the NSA TSP scandal.
Believe me when I say, "...the written laws and their interpretations are irrelevant when law enforcement and contract surveillance does not have to fear investigation or prosecution...".
Prior to The Enabling Laws passed after 9/11, the surveillance state was protected by county, municipal, state, and federal law enforcement. Torture, mind control, sneak and peak, warrantless eavesdropping, and the illegal dissemination of that tainted evidence was always hidden and used going back at least to 1986.
The real hot issue for CIA-FBI-DOJ was ignored: OPERATION SLAMMER (so called "non consensual human experimentation").
This is how the power elite running the secret corporate privatized surveillance state created Manchurian candidates like me. The CIA contracted out the "involuntary mind control chipping" of me, after I signed and sent my DOJ OIG Complaint back in 2004. Then, CIA-FBI tortured me in my home using the chip and other "sources and methods" hidden behind the bogus assertion that "state secrets" prevents review or investigation of numerous murders and attempted murders (including the attempted murder of SD US Sen Tim Johnson after I visited his Sioux FAlls, SD, congressional office).
There is a lot more info in my second complaint...but Glen Greenwald and others "did not want to talk to me". Not even The ACLU Nat Sec Division will interview me for five minutes?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by ThomasBean.
Re: REVOLUTION
Imagine what it costs to litigate civil liberties....and what do you accomplish when badges-prosecutors-judges do not and will not police themselves or any other police state actor????!!!!!
Exposure in the form of litigation......is not a prosecution resulting in jail.
In 1986, the Patriot act and EIT were used on me to run Operation Slammer .......and...no US ATTY or FBI agent in Sioux Falls, SD,...ever...ever...ever conducted a prelim inquiry into my allegations after FBI HQ and FBI OPR had access to my DOJ OIG complaint?!!!
The problem is not bad law.....it's bad police state actors who will not uphold their fiduciary duty./div>
Re:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Talk about a short memory...
Secret DOJ memos hiding strained interpretations of "void for vagueness" enabling laws.
Everything is a secret.....you have to piece together the policy from statements made by police state enablers....and guess correctly what the secret policy and practices are with no access to any definitive statement or challenge of practices that are hidden after arrest and charges are litigated./div>
Re: DEA teaches agents to recreate evidence chains to hide methods
Hiding the sources and methods was rationalized by the bogus assertion "state secrets" on a global battlefield.
I put this in my first DOJ OIG complaint that Glen Fine and FBI HQ obstructed.
Why ACLU won't interview me....is anyone's guess???
I'm the most important client they could have in a long time......yet....ACLu has never responded to my communications./div>
The War Commissions Act legalized "Entrapment"?
What does that mean?
Entrapment was always used by overzealous cops and prosecutors...so, uh...hmmmm...why legalize it?
With entrapment...Brady Ruling still applies...but, ahem...whose gonna prosecute the prosecutors at the county, state, and fed levels when they join conspiracies to entrap (what does that mean?) while also refusing to admit "just exactly how did they entrap someone"?
"Entrapment" was legalized but not defined so that a "good faith defense" existed so that prosecutors did not have to investigate or file charges for outrageous civil rights violations in which "CIA Non Consensual Experimentation" could focus on "mind control" and "subliminal programming" as part of Operation Slammer.
Go ask FBI HQ what they know about being briefed on Operation Slammer by whistleblower Julianne McKinney?/div>
Re: Re:
It's all in my second US DOJ Civil Rights complaint...that Holder and James Comey known about...but will not investigate or even conduct a five minute interview?/div>
Re: Re: My new pet peeve
No matter what.....the written laws don't matter if you don't have actual and explicit notice of "who, what, when, why, and how" to satisfy Fed Judges demanding that a litigant prove standing (party in interest, actual harm analysis).
How can anyone challenge NCTC and FBI-CIA assassinations of my known associates....when it's all "state secrets" used to protect "sources and methods"????/div>
Re: Re: Talk about a short memory...
Anyone criticizing the Gov, is also a terrorist.
Anyone advocating civil rights...is...you guessed it...a terrorist.
Since terrorists "aiding and abetting Al Qaeda" on a global battlefield without limitations...are not US citizens any more (citizenship taken away secretly and covertly)...therefore...THE NSA DOES NOT MONITOR OR SURVEIL US CITIZENS.
You have to follow the press releases...and put the puzzle together because the logic is so strained that NSA apologists are afraid to "give up the scam" to prevent notice required to challenge the policy and practices in Fed courts./div>
I wrote the US DOJ OIG complaint that Thomas Tamm reported to James Risen
Believe me when I say, "...the written laws and their interpretations are irrelevant when law enforcement and contract surveillance does not have to fear investigation or prosecution...".
Prior to The Enabling Laws passed after 9/11, the surveillance state was protected by county, municipal, state, and federal law enforcement. Torture, mind control, sneak and peak, warrantless eavesdropping, and the illegal dissemination of that tainted evidence was always hidden and used going back at least to 1986.
The real hot issue for CIA-FBI-DOJ was ignored: OPERATION SLAMMER (so called "non consensual human experimentation").
This is how the power elite running the secret corporate privatized surveillance state created Manchurian candidates like me. The CIA contracted out the "involuntary mind control chipping" of me, after I signed and sent my DOJ OIG Complaint back in 2004. Then, CIA-FBI tortured me in my home using the chip and other "sources and methods" hidden behind the bogus assertion that "state secrets" prevents review or investigation of numerous murders and attempted murders (including the attempted murder of SD US Sen Tim Johnson after I visited his Sioux FAlls, SD, congressional office).
There is a lot more info in my second complaint...but Glen Greenwald and others "did not want to talk to me". Not even The ACLU Nat Sec Division will interview me for five minutes?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by ThomasBean.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt