Except for the part where, xomtrary to Koby;s deliberate lies, the content is not passed off the platform to the user, but remains inextricably associated with the platform, unlike with actual transmission networks.
Facebook posts are Facebook posts. Twitter posts are twitter posts.
Notice that your phone calls aren't branded with "This caller brought to you by Bell-Atlantic!" and your web packets don't include "This server connected by Concast!"
"The plaintiff has to prove their claims before anonymity can be removed" is but one nail in the coffin for Jhon Smith's always-declared plans to defraud the court.
Case in point - a literate person wouldn't have used the inaccurate description of "dodged the question" to refer to me shooting down your pathetic attempt at deflection.
The more a source lies unabashedly, the more lostinlodos trusts it.
Which is also why he trusts Breitbart, that only rarely corrects any of its numerous deliberate lies, over something like the Washington Post, that always corrects its rare error.
As we see repeatedly and clusively proven over and over, one's agreement with Trump on a subject is inversely proportional to one's competence and understanding of that subject.
(untitled comment)
Remember, a Republican only makes an accusation if they're guilty of it.
/div>Re: Loitering Signal Association
Except for the part where, xomtrary to Koby;s deliberate lies, the content is not passed off the platform to the user, but remains inextricably associated with the platform, unlike with actual transmission networks.
Facebook posts are Facebook posts. Twitter posts are twitter posts.
Notice that your phone calls aren't branded with "This caller brought to you by Bell-Atlantic!" and your web packets don't include "This server connected by Concast!"
/div>(untitled comment)
"The plaintiff has to prove their claims before anonymity can be removed" is but one nail in the coffin for Jhon Smith's always-declared plans to defraud the court.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some
[lostin "Karl is against free speech! It's not a coup attempt!" lodos asserts facts contrary to evidence as always]
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
Borders only need to be secured against brown people, dont'cha know?
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re:
Case in point - a literate person wouldn't have used the inaccurate description of "dodged the question" to refer to me shooting down your pathetic attempt at deflection.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
The more a source lies unabashedly, the more lostinlodos trusts it.
Which is also why he trusts Breitbart, that only rarely corrects any of its numerous deliberate lies, over something like the Washington Post, that always corrects its rare error.
/div>Re: I'm failing to see the problem...
... said nobody with any competence in the subject, ever.
/div>Re: Re:
My comments are intended for literate readers, not you.
/div>Re: Re:
It sounds very similar to what Project Veritas tried to pull, claiming "Google/twitter insider" authority to pure lies.
/div>(untitled comment)
The easiest way to discredit a pathological liar is to quote him.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20211109/10460447910/latest-version-congresss-anti-algorithm- bill-is-based-two-separate-debunked-myths-misunderstanding-how-things-work.shtml#c2288
https://www.t echdirt.com/articles/20211212/11063648109/tenth-circuit-appeals-court-says-fourth-sixth-amendment-ri ghts-are-meaningless-when-national-security-is-line.shtml#c445
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
And fascist terrorist riots.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
Tax and border policy, for starters.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
A Libertarian is just a Republican who knows the age of consent in all 50 states.
/div>Re: Re: Wait…
As we see repeatedly and clusively proven over and over, one's agreement with Trump on a subject is inversely proportional to one's competence and understanding of that subject.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Twitter, facebook/meta, Youtibe, Amazon, and Google, to name a few that fit that description
/div>Re:
[Projects facts contrary to evidence]
/div>Re: Re: Re:
We also don't have to lie that what Rogan doing is merely "speech we disagree with" or that its existence is in any way threatened.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Remember that vaccine disinformation is officially a "Conservative value" accprding to Texas Republicans.
/div>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: conservative value
A week later and no t a peep. Perhaps the troll didn't actually want primary sources after all.
/div>More comments from Toom1275 >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Toom1275.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt