Your initial argument that the complaint alleges no competitors while suggesting the competitors are used when "googling" has a flaw in that a "monopoly" can be achieved while still having competitors. I believe you had used this argument in a previous article. Competitors can exist, but not be frequently used, giving the company monopoly powers over the market without being a literal monopoly.
Of course I agree that the litigation is ridiculous. If the government is so concerned about monopolies ruining our economy I think they should go after the low hanging fruit first. There is so much of it these days, it would be hard to know where to start.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by zeeri.
Not quite
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by zeeri.
Submit a story now.