SEC Charges 14-Year-Old With Net Stock Fraud
from the they-just-get-younger-and-younger dept
What does it say about our current stock market when a 14 year old kid can easily manipulate it to the tune of nearly $300,000. All the kid did was buy some stocks and then hype them like crazy on different message boards. What's scary is how effective he was. The article points to one case where he caused a stock to nearly quadruple. Do people do any real research when investing any more?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Two Thoughts...
Second, since this episode points out the complete stupidity and gullibility of people who buy stocks based on completely unsubstantiated posts they read on www message boards, I wonder whether it would be legal and/or ethical to capitalize on this -- if, through some data mining you thought you discovered a pattern of somebody perpetrating a pump-and-dump scheme, could you place orders to take advantage of it? It seems wrong, but why? In theory, you're acting on the same information that's available to anyone else. Just to be clear: you're not the one putting out the misinformation; you're detecting it (you think).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two Thoughts...
You'd probably be better off using the same scheme to blackmail the fraudster. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two Thoughts...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two Thoughts...
The trouble with my scheme is that it would be too hard to take advantage of it. Assuming that the fraud is detectable (which is not a trivial assumption), the simple way would be to sell short when a stock jumps as a result of a pump-and-dump, but it's virtually impossible to short a thinly-traded penny stock. Alternatively, one could buy up some shares as soon as a scammer's post is detected (hopefully before the run-up starts), but that's risky.
The best way to profit from this would be to sell subscriptions to a scam alert newsletter, I guess.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two Thoughts...
"Hi, FBI? I've created this great stock fraud where I'd be raking in the bucks, but this asshole is blackmailing me. Can you get him for me. Thanks. Most appreciated."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
14 year old
my son now 14 years old when he was only 12 he opened up his first cridet card i recived a ------ one card with 3000.00 dollars on it and the 2nd one was from chas- and it had 1000.00 then d-ll computers gave him another 10,000.00 what should i do email me at sprintfan14701@gmail.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]