Buy.com settles price suit

from the this-sets-a-bad-precedent dept

Buy.com has tenatively settled a class-action lawsuit that was filed by thousands of customers who claim to have been ripped off earlier this year. The lawsuit stemmed from a pricing error that occured on a ViewSonic monitor. Because the error occured over a weekend and Buy.com didn't correct it immediately, a number of orders were placed that were subsequently cancelled. Any payments to customers for these type of problems sets a bad precedent in my mind. Stores make pricing errors all the time, both online and offline. That's life and if these stores are going to be taken to court each time, it's going to turn into a litigation nightmare.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Mike, 16 Oct 2000 @ 10:53am

    Pricing errors

    I used to work for a global retailer and yes, pricing errors do occur all the time. However, it was very rare that a pricing error would go undiscovered for very long since the store's actual inventory would be depleted in a heartbeat. This would lead to the issuance of 'rain-checks' within an hour or so of opening, notifying the store management of the blunder. This, in turn, would lead to a 'ad correction' notice being displayed in the front window. Legally, the store is now covered. In addition, it was very impractical for a disgruntled shopper to find 100's of other disgruntled shoppers in the same predicament. The net changes this scenario, with shopping models like Buy.com allowing shoppers to see how many other folks are 'in line' on an item and allowing them an easy way to create a 'collective gripe' about the pricing error. The problem I always have with on-line shopping models is that they think that they are SO different that they don't have similar rain-check policies, etc. Offline or on, the consumer is already trained to expect a certain process to be in place. The fundamental flaw with most etailers is that they don't have a CLUE about retail....the "e" doesn't change that.

    -Mike

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.