Trespassing On The Web
from the old-laws,-stupid-interpretations dept
The New York Times has a good article looking at the effect of some recent legislation suggesting that online bots may be considered "trespassing" on other sites. We had covered the first part of this story last year. It was stupid then and it's stupid now. While I understand the basic reasoning behind the most recent ruling, it sounds like they were more focused on the use of the bot, rather than the whole "trespassing" issue. If they rely on the trespassing claim then it opens a whole can of worms. Basically, anyone could be seen to be trespassing on any website. If a website is open and there's no password protection, I don't see how anyone can consider it trespassing. That's like kicking people you don't like out of a store for trespassing, while letting others stay. If the companies are that upset about these bots, then build a technology solution that blocks them from getting in. Leave the courts alone. It's only going to cause problems.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
