Content Is Not King

from the it's-all-about-the-connectivity dept

A very very interesting (though very long) article about how content isn't king. Instead, it's connectivity that really drives the internet forward - and that's where the money is to be made. This doesn't mean content is dead, but it is worth thinking about the importance of connectivity as well. The article also suggests that this means that the "balkanization" of the net into "walled gardens" (as we've discussed here recently) is probably less of a threat than many people believe. Definitely worth reading.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Phillip, 6 Feb 2001 @ 11:58am

    Heard it all before

    I've lost count of the number of articles that claim "content is not king" and that xxx is where the money is to be made (substitute xxx for connectivity, ecommerce, portals, vortals, Internet communities, etc).

    The article seems to muddle its premises a lot. He says, "Web was invented to allow scientists to communicate with each other and access data, not for content delivery". Er no, the web was not invented for communication. The scientists used email and Usenet. And what is content delivery if not allowing people to access data?

    He also says, "even if content were king on the Web now, the Web is not king of the Internet". But the "content is king" phrase was first applied to the web and not the Internet (as far as I know). Hence his following arguments are against a faulty premise

    Phillip.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2001 @ 3:12pm

    Quality of articles


    Thanks for the posting... links like this make Techdirt a cut above.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ryan, 6 Feb 2001 @ 6:51pm

      Re: Quality of articles

      I'm actually a little worried about a walled garden scenario in a slightly difference sense. If content isn't king and stays unprofitable at what point will the quality publications stop allowing free access (walling out others who will not or can't pay)?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 6 Feb 2001 @ 7:09pm

      Re: Quality of articles

      Hey, thanks. Whoever you are. We really appreciate that!

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.