Banners Build Brands

from the aha dept

When banner ads first showed up on the internet, I thought the whole concept of the "click-through" was ridiculous - why would companies want to send people away from their site? At the same time, I could see how banners were useful strictly for branding. If I see enough banners, I might not click through on any of them, but I'll remember some of the brands I see. It seems that most people (or at least companies involved in advertising) felt the other way around (and made lots of money in doing so). They pushed the whole click through model (though more and more companies have been abandoning it) as a good metric to use for the value of advertising. Now, here's a study that points out that banners do help to increase brand awareness. Of course, you could also say that X10 has increased their brand awareness greatly with their damn pop ups as well - though much of it is (hopefully) negative. Update: Ah. Perfect timing. Here's an article saying that more and more companies won't give click through data anymore, because they don't think it matters.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Joe Schmoe, 13 Jul 2001 @ 8:04am

    One word sums this all up...


    "Sheeple"

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    mlr, 13 Jul 2001 @ 1:24pm

    No Subject Given

    media metrix claims X10 was the 4th most visited site for the month of june... probably just people looking for a way to get rid of those hideous pop unders.

    you can get rid of them for 30 days by going to:
    http://www.x10.com/home/optout.cgi?DAY=30&PAGE=http://www.x10.com/x10ads1.htm

    this sets a cookie on your machine that expires after 30 days. but you can probably just modify the DAY=30 to DAY=365 and maybe the cookie won't expire for a year.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 13 Jul 2001 @ 1:47pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      Yeah, I've seen that but I have major problems with it. Why should I need to opt out? I never had the choice of opting in. Besides, it also means I need to go to their site, and I don't want to give them any more traffic. I've always avoided plugins that wipe out ads, but I'm seriously considering ones that will get rid of pop ups.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        mlr, 13 Jul 2001 @ 1:58pm

        Re: No Subject Given

        you and your idealism. maybe if they see enough traffic on their opt-out link, they will realize how lame pop up/under ads are and stop making them. or maybe i'm being idealistic.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Brian, 13 Jul 2001 @ 2:41pm

        Re: No Subject Given

        I wish MSIE and Netscape supported disabling of
        window.open() -- between using junkbuster as
        a filtering proxy and turning off window.open()
        in Konquerer, I am nearly ad free.
        Brian

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 15 Jul 2001 @ 12:18pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          Turning ad's off is a form of stealing. Sites that use ads use them simply because they cant afford them out of their pockets.

          Most webmasters, given the choice to have a site without ads that is fully financed through some other means, would jump at it. Until something like that comes, or until people stop minding to pay subscription fees to thousands of sites, ads will never die.

          If you disable ads you disable the webmasters only way of making money from their site.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Mike (profile), 15 Jul 2001 @ 12:58pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            I never said that I thought ads would go away. However, if the ads cause me problems (as the popups do), then I have every right to turn them off.

            link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.