If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Solution...
Something that occurs to me: it isn't exactly compatible with current thinking about copyright law, but consider the fate of something universally regarded as obsolete, like Windows 3.1. As computers get replaced, millions of licenses have been abandoned. (And I'm not even considering any that have been applied toward an upgrade or fell under site license agreements.) If it's universally acknowledged that a Win3.1 license is so worthless since so many have been thrown away, could it be argued somehow that Microsoft can no longer expect to reap any license fees for random Win3.1 copies unless it can somehow prove that the number still in use exceeds the number of abandoned licenses?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How About...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple does this too
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Apple does this too
Apple distribute older version of their Operating Systems for free, online.
you just go to the Apple website, and download it. Only the recent Operating Systems require a purchase.
Considering that every Mac is sold with an OS, your comment is absurd. Apple is not hassling anyone for license violations.
If you don't believe me, just look on the Apple website - lots of free software and operating systems.
You can even get Darwin - a server OS designed for streaming media. This will run on PCs. It is Open Source, published uner the Apple Public Source License.
[ link to this | view in thread ]