If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Wrong Reasons
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this really a net specific issue?
A sticky issue to be sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is this really a net specific issue?
I think that all is fair game as long as it's under the control of the viewer. Nobody questions my right to flip channels or mute the volume or push the image into a P-in-P window. Cable companies have very limited rights to insert ads, I believe, in regular commercial slots, but always based on a contract with the broadcaster. Those principles seem just as valid on the web: as an end user, I can install whatever browser software or plug-in I want, including ad filters, but nobody else, like an ISP can make any changes to content as it is delivered to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]