Behind Excite@Home's Failure And AT&T's Involvement

VCs Looking To Invest In Public Companies

from the better-deals dept

Thu, Aug 30th 2001 1:41pm — Mike Masnick

More venture capital firms are starting to look at investing in public companies (called PIPEs for "private investment in public entities"). Since so many stocks are so low, and many of the companies are desperately in need of cash, it seems like a good match. The problem is that VCs come with strings attached. They often want a board seat, and can be pretty active. Of course, that could be helpful for a young company that went public too early and is in need of guidance. Of course, who knows how useful that guidance is. VCs "guided" plenty of failed companies in the last few years...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

2 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ed, 30 Aug 2001 @ 4:45pm

And the public shareholders get. what?
Wouldn't this kind of deal need shareholder approval? If so, my gut reaction as a shareholder would be "tough, let the VCs buy shares on the open market like the rest of us." Of course, that may not count for anything if company insiders own most of the shares.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 30 Aug 2001 @ 5:07pm
  
  Re: And the public shareholders get. what?
  The public shareholders get a company that hasn't run out of money... Though, in general it does suck for them. This is a situation, though, where the company is selling shares that they own directly to the VC. It's similar, in a sense, to a secondary offering, except that the entire price is negotiated up front, rather than dependent on what the underwriters can do with the shares. Plus, it doesn't immediately dilute the publicly owned shares, because the VCs are locked in for a certain period of time. So, the fact that the money comes at a more set amount from a VC, instead of the underwriter could (if you need justification) account for the below market price of the shares.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]