Should Palm And Handspring Merge?

from the why-shouldn't-they dept

To be honest, I never fully understood why Jeff Hawkins and Donna Dubinsky left Palm to create Handspring in the first place. All they did was build a device that looked exactly the same, using the same operating system, but with a slot in the back for add-on modules. Not sure why they couldn't have just added the slot into the Palm itself while they were still there. Anyway, since then, the two companies have fought against each other and dragged each other down, while Microsoft has laughed on and taken market share. Now, that Palm's CEO has left the scene, analysts are calling for the two companies to merge. I'm always a little wary of analysts telling companies who they should merge with, but here's a case where the two companies never should have been separate companies in the first place.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    prash, 19 Nov 2001 @ 2:39pm

    I'm not sure...

    I think one of the reasons Hawkins and Dubinsky left Palm was they couldn't get the springboard done and that the product development cycle had been slowed down. Just look at how fast Handspring has introduced new products compared to Palm. And they aren't afraid to go after their sacred cows. Palm is still focused on Graffiti, while the creator of Graffiti (Hawkins) has moved on to a pda/phone with a keyboard. That said, a merger might help reinvigorate Palm in the way Jobs was able to reinvigorate Apple.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      mhh5, 19 Nov 2001 @ 3:24pm

      I'm sure.. MS will win...

      I agree with Mike. Handspring is an unnecessary company. But I'm sure it made some people lots of instant cash, so there was a reason behind forming the company. But despite the reasoning, there's no excuse for the stupidity of forming an even more competitive market when MS will swoop in and clean house. MS will win. It's only a matter of time.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ed, 19 Nov 2001 @ 3:19pm

    Corporate Musical Chairs

    If this merger ever happened, it would only be the latest twist in the bizarre game of musical chairs in Palm's corporate history. I wonder why anybody still believes that maneuvers like mergers, acquisitions and divestitures (and intra-corporate reorganizations, too) actually make a positive difference.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    john, 19 Nov 2001 @ 4:15pm

    microsoft?

    microsoft doesn't make PDA's. they make an OS for PDA's. why does no one seem to remember that? PocketPC is not a pocket pc, it is a pocket pc os.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 19 Nov 2001 @ 5:47pm

      Re: microsoft?

      Indeed, but each sale of a Microsoft OS based PDA is a sale that Palm or Handspring has lost. That's competition... anyone who makes you lose a sale, whether a direct competitor or not, is a competitor.

      Microsoft doesn't make PCs either, but they hurt Apple in exactly the same way...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      mhh5, 19 Nov 2001 @ 5:55pm

      Re: microsoft?

      Who said MS made or has to make a PDA? Palm also makes an OS. I'm sorry I didn't make it more clear. Palm's OS marketshare will probably shrink to nothing. MS will win the PDA OS battle. Who knows if Palm can survive just making hardware? Maybe. I doubt it though....

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    alternatives(), 19 Nov 2001 @ 8:28pm

    The Apple connection

    When Steve Jobs cancelled the Newton Inc spin-off, most of the Newton staff moved to Palm.

    This staff had "rosetta" ported to palm hardware in under 6 months. The problem? The Newton engineers had 'Apple intellectual property', so to implement real handwriting or ARM based palms would require time to avoid Apple's legal staff. About 2 years, in fact.

    Palm Corporate wanted to move to real handwriting....and this would have ment the death of Graffitti-the baby of the founders. Hawkins/Dubinsky felt this is WHY palm succedded, and therefore went off on thier own.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.