Don't Bother Emailing Your Congresscritter

from the email?--whazzat? dept

Ah. A government for the people by the people... who ignores the people. Email should be great for politicians. It allows their constituents to communicate with them easily. Especially in this time when any postal mail heading in the direction of Washington D.C. might be a bit scary, you would think that politicians would embrace email. You would be wrong. A NY Times test shows that most Congressional and Senate offices really really (really!) would prefer that you not send them email. Fewer political offices list public email addresses, and very few respond. I can understand that non-email requests or letters get more attention because the person has obviously put more effort into it. However, to ignore and shun email altogether seems like a positively shortsighted plan. Perhaps someone needs to come up with a good email management program designed for folks in Congress. It could help automatically sort emails by whether or not the writer was a constituent, and what they're issue of choice was. It would be like an automatic polling system. "Look, Senator, we're receiving twice as many emails for responding to email than against..."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Joe Schmoe, 13 Dec 2001 @ 9:20am

    No Subject Given

    It's just a sad fact, that for any progress like this to occur, the current crop of ol' farts, are going to have to literally, die off...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Dec 2001 @ 9:52am

    Re: No Subject Given

    now now, it will also be ok if they just retire.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Joe Schmoe, 13 Dec 2001 @ 10:45am

    Re: No Subject Given

    Sure would be, but that is not the modus operandi for politicians... We got quite the batch of corrupt, detached, old, farts at present.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Will, 13 Dec 2001 @ 11:01am

    Article leaves out important points

    I have interned in a congressional office and there are two primary reasons why Congress is apathetic to email:
    (1) It is nearly impossible to verify that the person is within the representative's constituency unless they provide an address and means of contact, or even if it is a real person and not a spam bot. The representative is primarily concerned with what their constituency thinks, not what some random person with access to a computer thinks. Additionally about a third of those people that include their address are emailing the wrong congressman anyway. Until digital signatures that for certain verify a person is who they say they are, another means of contact is going to be required.
    (2) It takes much less determination to sit down and write an email than it does to write a letter. The primary job of a congressional office is to represent the people to Federal agencies (i.e. INS, IRS, etc.). If a case worker is going to spend the incredible amount of time that it takes to deal with a Federal agency, they want to know that the constituent really wants assistance and is not just angry and pounding off an email that they will not follow up.
    Don't be so quick to judge the government because there is usually a reason things are the way they are.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Dec 2001 @ 12:00pm

    This is a bit old... anyone have an up to date sou


    Senator_Stevens@stevens.senate.gov, webmail1@murkowski.senate.gov, senator@sessions.senate.gov,
    senator@shelby.senate.gov, blanche_lincoln@lincoln.senate.gov,
    senator.hutchinson@hutchinson.senate.gov, info@kyl.senate.gov, John_McCain@mccain.senate.gov,
    senator@boxer.senate.gov, senator@feinstein.senate.gov, senator_allard@exchange.senate.gov,
    senator@dodd.senate.gov, senator_lieberman@lieberman.senate.gov, senator@biden.senate.gov,
    webform@carper.senate.gov, senator@graham.senate.gov, senator_cleland@exchange.senate.gov,
    webform@miller.senate.gov, senator@akaka.senate.gov, senator@inouye.senate.gov,
    tom_harkin@harkin.senate.gov, senator_grassley@exchange.senate.gov,
    senator_craig@exchange.senate.gov, webmail@crapo-iq.senate.gov, dick@durbin.senate.gov,
    senator_fitzgerald@fitzgerald.senate.gov, senator@bayh.senate.gov, senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov,
    webmail@brownback.senate.gov, pat_roberts@roberts.senate.gov, jim_bunning@bunning.senate.gov,
    senator@mcconnell.senate.gov, senator@breaux.senate.gov, senator@kennedy.senate.gov,
    john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov, senator@mikulski.senate.gov, senator@sarbanes.senate.gov,
    senator@collins.senate.gov, Olympia@snowe.senate.gov, senator@levin.senate.gov,
    senator@stabenow.senate.gov, senator@wellstone.senate.gov, senator_carnahan@carnahan.senate.gov,
    kit_bond@bond.senate.gov, senator@cochran.senate.gov, senatorlott@lott.senate.gov,
    conrad_burns@burns.senate.gov, Senator@Edwards.senate.gov, jesse_helms@helms.senate.gov,
    senator@conrad.senate.gov, senator@dorgan.senate.gov, chuck_hagel@hagel.senate.gov,
    mailbox@gregg.senate.gov, opinion@smith.senate.gov, senator@torricelli.senate.gov,
    Senator_Bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov, senator_domenici@domenici.senate.gov,
    senator_reid@reid.senate.gov, senator@schumer.senate.gov, senator@clinton.senate.gov,
    senator_dewine@dewine.senate.gov, senator_voinovich@voinovich.senate.gov,
    jim_inhofe@inhofe.senate.gov, senator@nickles.senate.gov, Oregon@gsmith.senate.gov,
    senator_wyden@exchange.senate.gov, senator_specter@specter.senate.gov,
    senator_chafee@chafee.senate.gov, jack@reed.senate.gov, senator@thurmond.senate.gov,
    tom_daschle@daschle.senate.gov, tim@johnson.senate.gov, senator_thompson@thompson.senate.gov,
    senator_frist@frist.senate.gov, Phil_Gramm@gramm.senate.gov, senator@hutchison.senate.gov,
    senator@bennett.senate.gov, senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov, senator@warner.senate.gov,
    senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov, vermont@jeffords.senate.gov, senator_murray@murray.senate.gov,
    maria@cantwell.senate.gov, russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov, senator_kohl@kohl.senate.gov,
    senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov, senator@rockefeller.senate.gov, senator@enzi.senate.gov,

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.