Arguing Against Government Support For Broadband

from the why? dept

Business Week has a good article arguing against government subsidies for broadband access. It is a popular topic in Washington DC these days - and people talk about the necessity of getting broadband into every home. This article steps back and asks "why?". While I'm a big fan of broadband, I think I agree. The more the government gets involved, the more screwed up things are likely to become. Obviously, things are pretty screwed up now, but these are technology and business model problems that are likely to be worked out (and probably have already started to be worked out). Once the government starts regulating things, it's only likely to hinder new technology developments in broadband.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    mhh5, 23 Jan 2002 @ 3:01pm

    If you ate a truckload of vegetables... you'd die.

    Can't seem to get over the quotes like "Why in the world should all taxpayers subsidize those who purchase one particular telecommunications service? ... Or people who raise homing pigeons? "
    Or "Broadband is not a matter of health and safety" which implies that the gov should only subsidy things that *are* a matter of health or safety.
    But who built the highway system? Did we wait for private companies to kludge together a national highway system? I think there are plenty of examples of 'government subsidies' that are controversially-beneficial.
    While I'm also highly skeptical of using taxes to prop up big businesses, I can understand the reasoning behind why public broadband might be beneficial. And I don't think that article addressed any actual issues other than to question the motive behind 'public broadband' and take an extreme position against it. Please, journalists of the world, think a little harder! At least attempt to see the other side's arguments.....

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      mechi cansky, 11 Feb 2002 @ 7:35am

      Re: If you ate a truckload of vegetables... you'd

      See, this is exactly the reason the internet is so needed for life on this planet, if you have done your homework you know that "journalists of the world, think a little harder" and "journalists, relevancies please"...are light years away from one another. As far as political muddling-what else could users of the web have expected? We need to explain these things by WOM-(word of mouth) just as we do on everything else.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.