NY Times Says Weblogs Are A Fad

from the of-course-they-are dept

I guess the NY Times wants to win next year's "Bloggie Award" for best article about blogs. They've come up with another article about blogs saying absolutely nothing new, and suggesting that blogs are a fad. While it's sure to be linked, dissected, and trashed from various weblogs (if it hasn't already been), I still find it amusing to see how the mainstream media has been trying to get their head around the blog concept for so long. Update: Dan Gillmor responds as a professional journalist who has a weblog.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    The Misanthrope, 26 Feb 2002 @ 8:29am

    Blogs a Fad?

    Another view, from MIT's Technology Review

    "Blog This", By Henry Jenkins



    Since he asked us to do so, I suppose planting the URL here is legal.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    The Misanthrope, 26 Feb 2002 @ 8:32am

    Re: Blogs a Fad?

    This time without characters neutralizing it:
    http://www.techreview.com/articles/jenkins0302.asp

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    bob, 26 Feb 2002 @ 11:06am

    we don't need more spam

    i especially like the part where the blogger-turned-spammer proudly boasts that "if you want to communicate an idea, e-mail it to people, rather than forcing them to log on to your site." Forcing??? the halmark of a good weblog is that people WANT to return and are given the choice. How many of his 50,000 e-mails end up unread, anyway? I still get stories e-mailed to me from the NYTimes, but i stopped reading them a long time ago.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Mike (profile), 26 Feb 2002 @ 11:27am

    Re: we don't need more spam

    I second that... Especially since Techdirt went the other way. It started as an email newsletter, and morphed into a site that seems much less intrusive and let's people come back and read what they want, when they want.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.