Slashdot Starts Charging For Ad Free Site
from the one-way-to-do-things dept
Well, it seems that Slashdot has decided to try a new business model. They're letting people pay a yearly subscription fee to view the site without ads. At least they're not making "premium content" available only to subscribers. It'll be interesting to see how the Slashdot faithful respond. Not surprisingly, the discussion is quite busy over there. Would it be petty to remind everyone that Techdirt.com is free and has no ads at all? Yeah, it probably would.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And for 3 days in a row, the /dork stories tracked
The ONLY reason I go back to /dork at this time it to read the user comments, because some of the readers actually share useful knowledge.
Others are just stupid. The one I spotted that was modded up claimed you need a full biohazard suit if you are an organic farmer. (dumb poster, and ever more moronic moderator)
If I find the new add scheme annoying, I'll do exactly what I did with Yahoo and the pop up adds....I'll stop going to /dork.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Har har
According to the poll on Slashdot, only 167 people (or 3% of those responding) have subscribed. Ouch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Har har
Once that happens, I wonder whether /. will be relevant at all. I only read /. now because it saves me from reading every heavily ad-laden page on cnet, zdnet, etc. Once /. gets bogged down with ads, too, I'll have to go to another level of meta-indexing like freshnews.org, which will mean I'll only hit /. when it has a story that looks interesting, and if that is, in turn, just a link to a different news source, then why not cut out the middleman?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]