Slashdot Starts Charging For Ad Free Site

from the one-way-to-do-things dept

Well, it seems that Slashdot has decided to try a new business model. They're letting people pay a yearly subscription fee to view the site without ads. At least they're not making "premium content" available only to subscribers. It'll be interesting to see how the Slashdot faithful respond. Not surprisingly, the discussion is quite busy over there. Would it be petty to remind everyone that Techdirt.com is free and has no ads at all? Yeah, it probably would.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    alternatives(), 1 Mar 2002 @ 1:17pm

    And for 3 days in a row, the /dork stories tracked

    about 1 week ago.

    The ONLY reason I go back to /dork at this time it to read the user comments, because some of the readers actually share useful knowledge.

    Others are just stupid. The one I spotted that was modded up claimed you need a full biohazard suit if you are an organic farmer. (dumb poster, and ever more moronic moderator)

    If I find the new add scheme annoying, I'll do exactly what I did with Yahoo and the pop up adds....I'll stop going to /dork.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    wonko, 1 Mar 2002 @ 2:29pm

    Har har

    I tried this with WonkoSlice recently, and while we get far less traffic than Slashdot, I had expected more than three people to pay for the ad-free version of the site. Alas, out of over 1,000 regular daily visitors, only three thought it was worth it, so I recently gave up on it.

    According to the poll on Slashdot, only 167 people (or 3% of those responding) have subscribed. Ouch.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed, 1 Mar 2002 @ 3:17pm

      Re: Har har

      But the real question is not the subscriber rate; everyone expects that to be very low. The bigger change /. is making is to include larger, more intrusive ads. How much will their traffic decrease as a result?

      Once that happens, I wonder whether /. will be relevant at all. I only read /. now because it saves me from reading every heavily ad-laden page on cnet, zdnet, etc. Once /. gets bogged down with ads, too, I'll have to go to another level of meta-indexing like freshnews.org, which will mean I'll only hit /. when it has a story that looks interesting, and if that is, in turn, just a link to a different news source, then why not cut out the middleman?

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.