A Mythic Perspective Of Commodification On The Web

from the huh? dept

Okay, so I've read the following article twice, and I think I sort of get some of it. However, I'm not sure I understand the conclusions and I have a ton of questions about it. It's a very academic paper looking at (I think) how the web may have undergone some commodification (basically turning concepts into goods that can be sold). The writer has chosen to look at it from the perspective of myths - and I still can't figure out exactly why. I'm open to someone who has a better grasp of what's being said here to help enlighten me. I think some of the ideas expressed in the article are certainly interesting (in terms of how the web has moved towards this more "corporate" world and whether or not it means that media will only focus on more mainstream publications...), but aren't developed fully. It does seem to fit with the article posted below this one in that they discuss some of the same ideas. However, while I found that one too obvious, this one is a bit too obscure.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    David, 18 Mar 2002 @ 5:19am

    Very poor...

    That's a very poor example of what can be a very woolly subject (media or communications studies) applying itself to a very tenuous subject matter (the internet). Any academic paper where 90% of the paragraphs start "As [author name] said, 'quote blah blah'..." isn't worth reading, as it has little or nothing original in it. And an analysis based on three articles in different issues of Wired? Hardly an enormous sample, is it?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.