The First Amendment And The Internet

from the interesting dept

A very interesting look at how the legal doctrine behind the free speech part of the First Amendment doesn't really apply to the internet. The conclusions the writer comes to isn't that we should regulate speech on the internet - but at the very least that we should be aware of what's happening. The article definitely makes some interesting points. The idea of free speech is that in the "marketplace of ideas" truth is likely to boil to the top - and readers of one opinion will also get to see the counter opinion. However, she says, that online rumors too often get taken as fact, and people tend to reinforce their old opinion - rather that search out counterpoints. I'm not sure I completely agree with this. While, I can see it happening in some cases, I think (for myself, and many others I know) I've been exposed to many many more viewpoints than I would see otherwise.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    bbay, 16 Apr 2002 @ 4:16am

    absence of counter speech

    I refute it thusly.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dale Gardner, 16 Apr 2002 @ 6:41am

    The Net is not that different...

    It's tempting to jump into a detailed analysis of this one, but I'll try and resist. Basically, I don't think the net is that different from any other media - if you're considering the notion of a marketplace of ideas, as the author does, I think you have to look at the behavior of the society as a whole, and rely less on the behavior of individuals. How many people actively seek out opinions that conflict with their own? Not many. While the World might be a better place if it happened, the fact is most people are comfortable with the media that reflects their own views - be it radio, television, newspapers, movies, the Internet, or whatever. Should we resist efforts to limit speech on the net? Yes, but not because the net is different from any other media.

    There is a thoughtful rebuttal of the column on the FindLaw website - go to the column, then follow the link for feedback. Much more detail. The poster also raises what I think are more interesting questions - such as how constraints surrounding posting of information about DeCSS square with free speec protections. For all of me, you could extend that to the DCMA and related activities.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.