The Return Of The Deep Linking Question

from the hello,-let-me-explain-how-the-internet-works dept

I thought we had gotten beyond this stage already. I remember five years ago when there were court cases about deep linking, and I thought it was just because people didn't understand the internet - and eventually they would realize they were being silly. Apparently, that's not the case. There's now a case in Europe of the Danish Newspaper Publishers Association suing a news aggregation service for "deep linking" to their news stories. This is ridiculous. The point of putting up a page on the web is so that people go to it. If you don't want people linking to you, don't put up a page. Beyond that, it's very easy to technologically block someone from linking to you if you really want to be stupid and discourage people from visiting your site. Apparently the Danish Newspaper Publishers Association didn't bother to take the time to figure that out. In fact, they didn't even talk to the company they're suing - who offered to simply stop the service from working for Danish customers. There is simply no reason to sue about this. They are telling people that they've put up a website and they don't want others to go to it. As someone from the aggregator says in the article, "saying that other sites can't link to your site is like being a member of a community and asking people not to talk to you."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    The Misanthrope, 19 Apr 2002 @ 7:41am

    Deep Linking

    Sounds like someone didn't get the "Eyeballs is Eyeballs" memo and is still operating under the knee-jerk, "This must be copyright violation!" theory.
    When I first started my website - which isn't much more than links to elsewhere - in addition to general research on copyright/fair use with regard to linking, I asked each and every "target" if they'd mind my linking to their site, article, etc. Every response (from those who bothered to respond) pretty much boiled down to, "Lift the CONTENT, and you'll be hearing from our lawyers. But LINK to us, you have our blessings. Another pair of eyeballs that might not have been."
    So what if someone's first visit to a site isn't through the front door? If they like what they see after having been directed there, who doesn't know how to find and click on "Home," or chip their way up the tree by editing the address window?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.