New Rules, So Much Like The Old Rules

from the not-much-help dept

Here's an article from Forbes looking at the new SEC proposed rule changes to keep equity analysts from recommending crap stocks again. As most people have mentioned, these rule changes seem really weak and unlikely to do anything. The Forbes article points out that most of them simply repeat rules that are already in place. Analysts aren't allowed to sell stocks they've just recommended. That's not new. Analysts can't trade good research reports for banking business. That's not new. The SEC has been losing more and more credibility over the years. The article recommends one simple rule that seems to make a lot of sense: no analyst should be able to put out research on a firm their company has business with. Simple, yet effective.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Ed, 9 May 2002 @ 12:01pm

    The Answer: Stop Listening To Them!

    As far as I'm concerned, analysts might as well hype whatever they want and start coming out with even more positive ratings, like "the better mousetrap" and "the best thing since sliced bread", because I'm not paying any attention to them any more.

    Most people already know better than to listen to someone cold-calling you from a no-name boiler room in Florida touting some thinly-traded penny stock. IMHO, the Wall Street analysts have cried "Strong Buy" once too often, and I now pay them the same heed. I'm counting on mutual fund managers to have the same healthy skepticism.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    steve snyder, 10 May 2002 @ 9:03am

    Ignore them but it's still a problem

    My inital reaction the same as Ed's. Just ignore them, the alalists are idiots who mostly act in their own best interests anyway, and it's been what way for awhile. But...the problem is while you and I and other intelligent people don't pay attention to them, so may others do. These people have the ability to move markets and manipulate stock prices--so we can't entirely ignore them. The SEC needs to get tougher. I'm still hoping for a world where full disclosure in fiancial matters by all publicly traded companies puts the analists out of business.
    steve

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.