Cingular Concerned About Wireless Porn
from the its-the-sex-stupid! dept
Rumor has it that Cingular plans to block porn on their wireless data services. One analyst speculates that they might be worried about having their brands associated with pornography. What will someone think if they walk by someone checking out Playboy on their Cingular wireless phone? Hey, where can I get that?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bathwater? Check... Baby? Check...
Guess I'll have to use the pay phone at the public library to get my porn fix, heheh.
This must be a grab for some sort of attention. Anyone who knows anything, knows that it's next to impossible to block porn. We've all had our noses drug through that morass several times now. What do they hope to accomplish? The moment they say that they can or even will, there is an imposed resposibility when it [eventually] fails. They're only going to end up with something resembling egg on their face...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bathwater? Check... Baby? Check...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: he is right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]