If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well said
My question is: What are the rules? Simply telling kids not to do anything stupid (or I guess "stoopid", for the on-line types) isn't going to get the job done. Specifically, what's OK? Telling people you're a school student? Your hair color? Real gender? The state you live in but not the city?
I think horrible things like this will continue to happen until: 1) we get a good idea of what sorts of information are most likely to enable "predation"; 2) we figure out how to communicate this to parents; and 3) we figure out how get parents to communicate it to thier kids.
I'm not dense enough to think this will eliminate the problem entirely. Long obviously had a whole series of issues to deal with and she actively pursued the encounter. I don't think anything her aunt could have said would have stopped her. But there must be at least some sort of "don't get into a car with a stranger" type of rules we could give kids to follow.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Common Sense
Problem is with the internet they are sitting at home in comfort and that real sense of fear isnt present.
And while I think its a good idea to apply voluntary safeguards on the internet for parents and more information, its ultimately up to the parent to protect the child.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not just kids
Today's tech world requires that we redefine what's acceptable to reveal to others, no matter what the medium -- phone, internet or live person. Not very many people even think about what they disclose, and until we change that, it's going to be difficult for our kids to understand.
Two examples: (1) remember when Dollar Rent a Car tried requiring fingerprints to rent a car (they now claim they were just test-marketing)? We heard stories about the people who refused, but how many people actually complied without thinking twice?! That's the danger. (2) I recently switched cellular carriers, and they wanted to know my SSN, drivers license number, my employer and a bunch more. I asked why, since I signed up to have the bill charged directly to my credit card. I was told that they conduct credit checks, and that they needed the information for "security purposes". I told them to take a hike. They gave me the service anyway, without providing all that private info. But as the rep put my papers in his flimsy file, I noticed dozens of other applications, with everything filled out. Some thief could easily snag that folder, and next thing you know, we have 30 new cases of stolen identity or fraudulent charges.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
The blame belongs to the parents who obviously were excersising zero supervision or control over this girl.
This of course will be overlooked because the internet angle makes for better headlines and allows self serving politicians to make lots of noise and push for more goverment controls on the internet
[ link to this | view in thread ]