Is Spam Policing Out Of Control?
from the possibly dept
We all know that spam is out of control, but are the spam police out of control as well? Over the years there have been plenty of arguments about the various spam blackhole lists - but many people still feel they're too arbitrary and too powerful. Many of the lists block out a huge number of legitimate addresses just to block a few spammers - and sometimes they do the blocking without confirming that there's an open relay in the first place.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
SPAM Police
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SPAM Police
If your ISP shut you down based on a single SpamCop complaint, without checking into it, then you've got an incompetent ISP.
On the other hand, if you're sending your weather alerts on behalf of local TV stations, do the stations supply you with the mailing list? If so, do you know where they got it? Some well-meaning people are naive enough to think that the list of "carefully selected people who've opted-in to receive your info" that they've purchased from some mailing list company wasn't really any old bunch of email addresses harvested from the web.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SPAM Police
The station doesn't supply a list. They promote the service and post a link to us on their web site to an ASP page that is dynamically customized with their information. The viewer signs up for the service through us although they sometime thinks it's the station. We do double opt-in before they get any alerts. People never save the sign up info so they forget their username and password or they simply can't navigate through the unsubscribe process. We recently had a case where the guy was complaining about how he never signed up for our service but was getting messages from us. After having him forward some examples to us we found that someone had setup a yahoo group that was forwarding our messages to the list and this guy was on their list. We located and removed the list from our list. We complained loudly to the list owner and yahoo. We heard from the list owner but not a peep from yahoo. The list owner then complained to the station about how poorly we handled the situation. The station manager called him a "poacher" and told him that if the people in his group wanted weather alerts they could sign up like everyone else. I was rolling on the floor laughing, I think I like her. The incident does prove a point though, we were being blamed for something we weren't doing. It could have been bad which is why we jumped on it so swiftly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SPAM Police
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SPAM Police
However, if I sign up for something, we just add it to the "allowed through" list. It's a happy medium.
One thing you mention in a later message is that users forget their username and password to unsubscribe. I have this problem a lot as well - in particular, often it's a pain to "send as" the email address with which I signed up (I usually use an "incoming only" address - so that I can ditch it if necessary).
My question is - why bother with error checking like that? If someone sends you a message saying "please unsubscribe address x" should you really care whether they remember their user details or not? Unless your list details are publically available, you aren't going to get non-legitamite requests - and the hassle you'd save by eliminating those hoops would be enormous. And in the worst case scenario, you'd remove someone from your list who still wanted the email. Presumably, they would contact and complain. However, the alternative (where someone can't figure out how to unsubscribe and therefore complains to spam cops) is much worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is Absolutely Correct
Once an organization is listed in one of these services, their ability to send e-mail is often blocked by major carriers. One client recently couldn't send e-mail anywhere into the Earthlink/Mindspring network. There is no one you can call about this when it happens, you just have to keep sending e-mail saying "HEY MORONS, CHECK THE FREAKING SERVER! IT'S NOT A REALY" until someone responds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]