New Study Says Open Source Less Secure

from the how-much-FUD-have-you-had-lately? dept

And the debate rages onward... I'm sure the folks over at Slashdot will have their own field day with this one, but I figured it was worth posting here as well. The Alexis de Tocqueville Institution, a "think tank", is coming out with a report saying that open source software is less secure than proprietary software. Of course, history seems to suggest otherwise, but why let things like actual facts get in your way. It's easy enough to see how you can make arguments either way. The open source crowd points out that more people look at and play with the code, and thus are more likely to quickly find (and plug) security holes. The proprietary supporters say that since hackers can't see the code, it's tougher for them to find the holes. Both points make sense initially. However, it's pretty clear that most hackers don't have much difficulty figuring out the holes in proprietary software, anyway. So, that argument pretty much goes away. How long until we find out how much money Microsoft donated to this think tank?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    LittleW0lf, 31 May 2002 @ 7:59pm

    Microsoft Sponsored Survey?

    I think studies like this should have, in big bold letters, "This study brought to you by the nice folks at Microsoft."

    Pure rubbish.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      goneaway, 1 Jun 2002 @ 12:09pm

      Re: Microsoft Sponsored Survey?

      If this white paper was published on a slash site it would be modded down to flamebait. I, of course, rose to the bait on my own site but regardless... If you dig into the "Institute" site a little more you'll find a number of press releases about their announcement that MSCE is the best thing since sliced bread. They're rabid free marketeers and it shows.
      We'll all read it but hopefully more as something a little funny and representative of the myriad forms that FUD takes.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    mhh5, 1 Jun 2002 @ 11:22pm

    yes...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.