Microsoft Doesn't Have To Disclose Lobbying Efforts

from the backroom-deals-stay-in-the-backroom dept

It seems that the judge in the Microsoft case agrees with Microsoft that its backroom dealings should stay in the backroom. The judge ruled that Microsoft doesn't have to reveal details of its government lobbying efforts - despite a law that says they clear are required to. The original complaint was that Microsoft only listed lobbying efforts with the Justice Department and not any Congressional members. The law reads "any officer or employee of the United States." However, the judge says that it should only apply to members of the executive branch, so Microsoft can keep up its lobbying of the legislative branch with relative secrecy. Seems like a bad interpretation of the law, since Congressional employees are clearly employees of the United States as well.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Mgallagher, 3 Jul 2002 @ 11:11am

    There HAS to be more to this story

    I do have to say that in my (limited) experiences with Federal Judges, the do seem to be pretty intelligent and quite fair people who do take thier responsibilities awfully seriously. I'm having a hard time accepting that CK-K would just arbitrarily disregard a law, that at least for a lay-person, seems pretty clear.

    There just has to be more to this.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 3 Jul 2002 @ 11:19am

      Re: There HAS to be more to this story

      You're probably right. I would love to see what that info is, though. If anyone knows... please share it.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jul 2002 @ 11:50am

    No Subject Given

    Well folks, this is just the beginning of M$ wriggling free of justice once again. You can be sure they will get off on all antitrust charges with a minor slap on the wrist. After which time, of course, they will resume their illegal and monopolistic ways.

    American justice!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anon, 5 Jul 2002 @ 6:23am

    Love the title to this bit...

    ...creative... :)

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.