AT&T Broadband Goes For Tiered Pricing
from the wrong-way... dept
A few months ago all the cable broadband providers started discussing tiered pricing for their service. One of the things they said was that the plan wasn't to penalize higher bandwidth users, but to offer lower introductory fees to try to get more people to sign up. I actually thought this was a much smarter way to offer tiered pricing, and would help these companies get many more subscribers. Apparently, AT&T Broadband wasn't a part of those discussions, or changed its mind. Instead of offering a lower priced introductory offer for slower broadband that might convince more people to sign up, they're launching a more expensive options for people who want slightly more bandwidth. I doubt many people will sign up for it. It's nearly twice as expensive, and the bandwidth difference isn't worth it. Makes you wonder who's making decisions over there.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Crazy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GREED
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tiered Pricing
But I still don't know about the tiered pricing in general--my problem with it is that it doesn't reflect the costs so they're charging more for something that doesn't cost them more. Once the line is there and everything is installed, does a 500k cable connection cost less than a 3 mb? I would think support is perhaps the biggest cost, that the truth is lower bandwidth users are the ones who are more expensive to support--high bandwidth users tend to be more computer savy and fix their own problems.
I do see one exception--I can understand truly excessive users paying more--say people doing major filesharing or what have you--at some point their "hogging" bandwidth has a negative impact on the rest of network.
steve
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's a start
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They will offer a lower-priced tier
I have their current service (claimed 1.5M/256K) and I'm in one of the areas to offer the faster service, but it doesn't seem like my connection ever achieves the rated speed. I'm certainly not going to pay more unless there's some guarantee of throughput. I think that may be the hidden danger in offering tiered pricing for cable modem service. I can put up with practically anything because it's better than dialup, but if I pay for the expensive plan and the resulting speed is little or no better than a cheap plan, then customer service will be hearing from me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]