Would Larry Lessig Destroy The Software Industry

from the who-is-Charles-Cooper dept

I have no idea who Charles Cooper is, but I'm beginning to find it impossible to believe anything he has to say. My only guess is that he's writing incredibly stupid things on purpose, just to generate some controversy over on Slashdot. Two weeks ago this was the guy we pointed out had absolutely no grasp of economics in announcing that free content went against capitalism. Now, he's saying that Larry Lessig doesn't get it when he says that software copyrights should only be good for 10 years. Cooper does a terrible job backing up his argument. As far as I can tell, his argument is that if software copyright is only 10 years, then it would keep the current software giants in power because no one would create any new software (at least, I think that's what he's saying - it's tough to say for sure) because 10 years isn't nearly long enough. Huh? How many software products from 10 years ago are you still using? Software's shelf life (for the most part) is significantly shorter than that, and I would say there are very few 10 year old software products that are still even being supported, let alone sold. I don't see how taking the copyright protections off of them would really influence anyone to do anything differently. Lessig's point, which Cooper can't seem to grasp, is that by opening up the intellectual property independent software developers (and, actually, any software developers) will be able to learn and improve on past developments. I didn't think it was that hard to understand.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Daniel, 10 Oct 2007 @ 2:48pm

    Copyright terms

    Obviously someone did not do any type of research. If a person is able to obtain a copyright (whether in art or software) the term of the copyright is life of the author plus 70 years. Intellectual property law is very complex, so I will just leave it at that. Quoting language, "it would keep the current software giants in power because no one would create any new software because 10 years isn't nearly long enough." This is why the software giants are using open source programs now, to compete with everyone else. Look up what open source programs are and your eyes will gleem with knowledge.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.