NSA Admits It Has Too Much Info

from the search-smarter,-not-harder dept

For a while now we've been complaining about the various proposals from government agencies to have more access to any sort of communications. It's been pointed out that simply adding more information to the pile doesn't help things. In fact, it makes it harder to find the information that is actually important. Now the NSA is giving SAIC nearly $300 million to build them a new system to better search through the info - as they've realized they simply can't find what they need. They even admit that they're drowning in information. Of course, what doesn't seem to occur to them is that maybe they shouldn't collect so much info, and should be more careful about what types of information they do collect. If they focused on smarter data collection instead of smarter searching, this wouldn't be a problem.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Duffman, 1 Oct 2002 @ 12:55pm

    Intelligence gathering

    The problem with that is that in intelligence gathering, you kind of have to just collect lots and lots and have lots of people go through it. You never know how the 'bad guys' will communicate their information, so you've gotta have all of your bases covered. Good to see this, though - finally an organization has been mentioned many times here.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    rama r., 1 Oct 2002 @ 1:17pm

    No Subject Given

    I'm totally for privacy, and am very anti-data collection, but *not* collecting data because they have too much would be short sighted. Some of the most interesting and useful variations of data mining were not originally intended when that data was collected- http://labs.google.com/ for example.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.