DVD Copying Software Sparks New Legal Battle

from the copy-this dept

Here's yet another legal battle of technology fighting Hollywood. A small company, 321 Software, that makes software to let people create copies of their DVDs has filed a lawsuit against the movie industry to have their software declared legal. On the face of it, their software violates the DMCA by circumventing DVD-copy protection schemes. However, the argument is that consumers have a fair use right to copy DVDs the same way they can make a fair use copy of a VHS movie or a CD, for personal use. I sense this is an uphill battle.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, 4 Oct 2002 @ 1:30pm

    Why not go to court?

    The only reason I can think that the movie studios don't want this to go to court is that (heaven forbid) the judge might decide that 321 Studios is not breaking the law.

    If the movie studios are so sure that what is being done is illegal, then they should be *demanding* that they go to court immediately.

    What surprised me the most is that the D.O.J. is siding with the movie studios on this issue and asking that it not go to court. I thought that the D.O.J. was supposed to fairly and accurately represent everybody equally... guess if you have billions of dollars at your disposal, you get treated more 'equally' than others.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bytehead, 5 Oct 2002 @ 3:07am

    DMCA?

    Wasn't that one of the arguments of DeCSS? That making a bit for bit copy of a DVD wasn't covered under the DMCA? I'm getting confused about this. There is no circumvention of anything. A bit for bit copy doesn't circumvent anything!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Oliver Wendell Jones, 7 Oct 2002 @ 7:16am

      Re: DMCA?

      Except it's not a bit for bit copy, it's a copy made with the encryption removed. You can create a bit-for-bit copy of an encrypted DVD, but it won't play in your DVD player. The section of the DVD that holds the CSS encryption key is not writable with a DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD+R/DVD+RW drive, and so making a bit for bit copy doesn't really do you any good.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.