Is Eliot Spitzer Wall Street's Worst Nightmare?

from the maybe...-maybe-not dept

I'm still not sure what to make of NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. I think he did an impressive job putting a lot of attention and pressure on Wall Street by being the first to aggressively go after Wall Street firms for their questionable practices during the boom years. However, I was a bit upset when he decided to settle the case with Merrill Lynch, making it seem just like "business as usual" - where these banks screw people out of money, until they get caught, deny any wrongdoing, pay a tiny fine, and keep doing the same thing. I also began to wonder if Spitzer's moves were done simply for the publicity of it - since all of the various announcements out of his office would make nice soundbites about how tough he was on America's oh-so-popular "corporate fraud" fad of the moment. Salon sat down with Spitzer for an interview that addresses many of these issues. He carefully sidesteps the more pointed questions dealing with the issues above, but it's still a very interesting interview.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Old Man Harris, 10 Oct 2002 @ 8:01pm

    No Subject Given

    There can be absolutely positively no question that Spitzer's primary motivation here is self-serving. The research/banking conflict has been common knowledge for well over a decade. Spitzer has known about it for years just like everyone else. There has been sufficient evidence to take legal action for years. Investors, both instituional and retail, have been losing money because of it for years. So why does he pick 2002 as the year to go after it? Your attempt to appear noble is pathetic, Elliot. Go work on your backhand.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.