No Evidence In Betting Scandal
from the the-odds-are-against-it dept
A follow-up story on yesterday's article about how an insider at the company that makes the wagering software used by OTB probably helped his fraternity brothers win $3 million by changing their bets in the computer. It seems that the software used by AutoNote is pretty damn old, and keeps no record of what people do in the system. So, lawyers for the accused are claiming there's no evidence that anything illegal was done. The only "evidence" is the amazing "coincidence" that the only winner of an incredible longshot (who just happened to place that same longshot bet six times) is good buddies with someone who had access to, and could make the changes in the system.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Greed will eventually catch up to you...
Unless he has proof that he always makes longshot bets and always bets the same bet multiple times, I think they're going to find him guilty of this.
Heck, even with that proof, they might still find him guilty.
Who do you think is going to end up serving more time, the guy who made the bet, or the guy who (possibly) made the changes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]