Net Porn Filters Just Don't Work
from the tell-us-again dept
Here's a completely reasonable opinion piece from SFGate talking about why internet porn filters are a waste of time - and why the Supreme Court shouldn't force libraries to install them. He points out that children, these days, are going to come across sexually explicit material no matter what they do. Putting up a porn filter that will block just a tiny bit of it on the internet isn't going to change that. This is, once again, a situation where parents need to take responsibility for properly educating their children. The amusing part of the article, though, is that he gets a VP of NetNanny, a filter company that supports the filtering requirement, to admit that his filters really don't work. "Ultimately, any kid that's determined to see this stuff will see it. There's nothing we or anyone can do to stop it."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why stop there?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why stop there?
But, you knew that, didn't you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
The Supreme Court is certainly not FORCING librarys to install filters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
No matter what the library *can* install filters if they want to. However, the government is trying to require them to in all cases. So, if the Supreme Court sides with the government, then libraries will be forced to install filters if they want to keep receiving the money that lets them stay in business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]