Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 9 Dec 2002 @ 8:17am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  Actually, most of the (proposed) bans are on "hand held" cell phones, not cell phones in general.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 9 Dec 2002 @ 8:34am

  
  

  ban built-in microphones

  wouldn t be easy forcing handset producers to produce cellphones without built in mic ?
  
  if it is such a threat to safety, giving handset with just remote earphones and mic would be the solution.
  
  But as usual worries are enough to justify fines on users (they re just building a disguised tax revenue source)

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Alexi, 9 Dec 2002 @ 8:54am

  
  

  Cell phone ban

  I agree with Mike. There is too much legislation passed as a "pain-reliever" rather than a cure. More responsibility should be placed on the user rather than the device. Because I cannot drive well when use a cell phone, I don't use one in the car. My wife can multitask better, so she has no problems driving and calling.
  
  And please, no legislation banning mics on handsets and requiring remote earphones! I can only imagine the places where those will get caught (gearshift knob?), the children that will choke on them, etc!

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 9 Dec 2002 @ 9:30am

    
    

    Re: Cell phone ban

    Most new cell phones already include an ear phone, some even have a separate mic on the cord. The problem is getting people to change their habits and use them.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Scott, 9 Dec 2002 @ 11:46am

  
  

  Lets get on the police

  I think that the problem goes far beyond the use of cell phones and I agree that the ban is not the answer.
  
  I find that many drives are bad ones. They cut into oncomming traffic, do not yield, poke their noses out at stop signs beyond the limit lines and do not know where they are going thus cutting into traffic with turns from the wrong lane.
  
  The answer. Make the cops do their job! There are vehicle codes and the cops should be giving tickets out for these infractions. Then people will need to go to traffic shool. They will eventually get it from brain washing of the vehicle code. I have gone so many times in the past I can recite the vehicle code for my state. I was alway sspeeding though.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 9 Dec 2002 @ 2:13pm

    
    

    Re: Lets get on the police

    Not all bad drivers are talking on their cellphones while driving, but most drivers who talk on their cellphones while driving are going to be more absent minded than were they not on their phones. The ban makes sense. Furthermore, talking on the phone in the car is more a desire than a need, whereas (in Mike's example) driving one's children around is not something that some can avoid. If talking on the phone is that important then get a earpiece and microphone. I haven't heard a single example opposing the ban that makes any sense at all.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      thecaptain, 10 Dec 2002 @ 7:16am

      
      

      Re: Lets get on the police

      "talking on the phone in the car is more a desire than a need"
      
      This echoes my thoughts lately about this debate...I mean you'd think it was impossible to get around without a cellphone! I mean, how did people ever go for a drive before they were invented?
      

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Human Factors Professional, 12 Mar 2003 @ 7:12pm

  
  

  banning cell phones

  you're all right. cell phones are distracting just like changing the radio station... the big difference is, imagine changing the radio station for 20 minutes straight. The effect of processing complex information on one's attention to the road yields an increased reaction time (takes longer to react) up to .85 seconds. At 65 mph, that's over 80 feet before you hit the brake pedal. The difference between cell phone and talking to a passenger? Well, a passenger responds to the road cues just like you do- traffic gets crazy and conversation eases up. And the radio? the radio doesn't require our response to a complex message, rather we can 'tune out' from the radio when traffic gets heavy. ... Still, answering a call may result in the most accidents due to cell phones. No matter where and when you're driving, you may have to answer that phone... It is not like changing a radio station when your attentional resources are freed up- like we do sitting at red lights often.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  brandon, 4 Nov 2003 @ 6:41pm

  
  

  u are totally wrong about this

  cell phones are a huge part in automotive accidents. I'm in the speech program at my high school and we had to do a debate on cell phone use in cars. Did u know that cell phone use in cars cauz 6% of all automotive accidents, that works out to 300 deaths a year, and so far 26000 people have died and 330000 injuries have happend so far. so tell me that they shouldn't be baned
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]