Intergraph Sues Dell, HP, Gateway Over Patents
from the wait-a-second... dept
Yet another silly patent story today. It seems that Intergraph is getting a little greedy with their patents. After settling with Intel over their patents on technology used in Pentium chips, they're now going to sue Dell, HP, Gateway for using Pentium chips in their computers. I don't see how they have any claim over those computer makers, since they're simply using the chips that Intel sold them. The patent problem is Intel's, and they've already settled. This is like an attempt to get paid twice for the patents.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Weird Patent Law Provisions
There is a special case for non-commercial consumers who purchased an infringing item in good faith. According to the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code), purchasers who meet the above definition must be indemnified by the manufacturer and/or the entity that sold them the item. The consumer can still be sued, but the seller must make good any damage done to the consumer, including legal fees.
In the case of Hp, Dell, etc., Intergraph probably has a very strong case, especially since Intel lost (and lost rather badly at that). Now whether or not Intergraph can show that they deserve any damages, after they have already collected a kings ransom from Intel, is another question.
While the whole patent system has some serious faults, this definition of infringement and who is liable to whom, is no more illogical than the rest of our federal civil system.
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer (thank God for small favors) and this is not legal advice, just observations from someone who has been on both sides of this fence.
Oh, and by the way, if you will read the first sentence of Title 35 again, you will see that there is no exception for people to make or use patents for their own use. The Urban Legend that 'it's OK to use a patent as long as I don't sell it' is absolutely wrong and just that, an Urban Legend. If you make it or use it (the patented invention), you are infringing!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]