Can Silicon Valley Stay Relevant?
from the moving-overseas dept
An interesting article predicting that Silicon Valley is going to have more difficulty staying relevant as more jobs continue to move overseas towards cheaper labor. On a related note, Kevin K submitted this interview with Craig Barrett from a couple weeks back, where he talks about moving jobs to Asia for the sake of finding better educated (read: cheaper) employees. This argument has come up many times over the years, and both sides seem to make sense. The reality, then, is probably somewhere in the middle. Clearly, cheaper, well-trained labor elsewhere is a draw for companies. However, part of what made Silicon Valley work so well was the unique infrastructure and support system that was built up around here. I'm not saying this can't be replicated, or that things won't be different in the future, but people who tend to focus on how one factor is going to drive huge economic changes tend to miss the really important stuff.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Just means higher standards for the valley
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
1. The English on foreign software (both application and documentation) makes no sense.
2. Rebellious Indians will steal US intellectual property.
3. Indians will sell proprietary business data to the highest bidder.
4. CNN shows footage of starving child laborers performing data entry tasks.
5. Sikh terrorists invade a US company's office and gun down 100 employees.
6. Hindu nationalists invade a US food chain's office and gun down 100 employees, because the US food chain sells beef.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it's a matter of POV
As an end user, I'd rather pay an extra $2-5 bucks to make sure the localization is done right (I've seen some pretty funny translation fuckups in user docs) so I don't have to pay somebody local $50-200/hour for XX hours to get whatever it is working right because neither I nor anyone else around me has ever used it before and nobody can make sense of the docs.
There are other reasons why foriegn outsourcing isn't all that great an idea. The Internet is a wonderful business tool, but if I have a for-real deadline, I don't want to try meeting it with the bulk of the development team 9-12 timezones away. Having one party waking up as the other is getting ready to go to bed can make for some hilarious communications errors, but they aren't all that funny when it's on the clock.
I'm not bashing Indian programmers, I merely believe we're probably all better off in the long run if our work is relatively localized.
I expect this outsourcing to start expensively backfiring sooner or later, but the urge to save nickels regardless of the impact on deadlines and quality will put a lot of American programmers and engineers out of work for a while.
I'm hoping some will go back to work competing with their ex-employers. If there are any smart VCs around, they might want to start financing this counter-trend.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it's a matter of POV
[ link to this | view in chronology ]