After Web Blew Up, Shift To Broadband Quietly Went On

from the so-what? dept

In the boom years there were all these startups that were trying to develop "broadband content". All of them failed miserably (and often, spectacularly). In the past couple years, though, it seems that people kept signing up for broadband - even without all that specially designed content. That's making the early believers sit up and start planning new broadband content. Of course, they're all planning to charge for this "premium" content, which (once again) suggests a general misunderstanding of how the internet works. The internet is still about communication and information - and not so much about entertainment. However, the broadband content producers still think of it as an entertainment delivery box, which doesn't mesh with how most people seem to view the internet. It seems unlikely that people will rush to pay to use the internet in a way that doesn't fit with how they use it. People like broadband because it lets them do more communication and get more information without having to deal with the annoying dialup process. They don't do it to be forcefed more TV-style content. That's what TVs are for.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, 8 Jan 2003 @ 11:07am

    After last night, I know why

    I went to work on a friend of a friend's PC. He is elderly and is still running Windows 95 on an old P-166.

    He was still using Internet Explorer 3.0 and it would choke on almost every web page and display a java-script error.

    After logging on to the net over his dial-up connection, I spent approx. 20 minutes going through the MS site trying to find IE 5.0, which of course is not any place obvious and IE 6.0 requires Win98 or higher. Once I finally found it and started the download, it took 1 hour and 45 minutes to download.

    He is a cable TV subscriber who's paying $20 per month for dial-up service. I told him that for about $10 more he could get a cable modem and we wouldn't have had to wait as long. He asked how long it would have been with a cable modem. I said, "rough guess, 2 minutes at the most". Today he's calling to see about transitioning to cable modem.

    People are getting tired of waiting on the internet, whether they're accessing "broadband type" content or not.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.