Remembrance Of Dot-Com Idiocy Past
from the craziness-indeed dept
Earlier this week James Ledbetter was getting torn up for trying to deny that he (as part of the Industry Standard) was part of the problem in a NY Times opinion piece (also reprinted here minus registration requirements). It seems that the opinion piece is really just a way for him to pitch his new book, Starving to Death on $200 Million, which sounds kinda boring. Much more interesting is the review Salon gives the book, pointing out that among the many problems the book has, (including Ledbetter trying to write about the collapse of a Silicon Valley magazine icon while being in New York and London) the biggest is that the death of the Industry Standard isn't really much of a story any more. The growth of the internet still is a story. The corporate scandals of the last year are stories. The death, due to mismanagement, of a magazine isn't much of a story.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ah, the Industry Standard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]