Google's Gaggle Of Problems
from the always-taking-aim-at-the-leader dept
People seem desperate these days to write any sort of Google backlash story. This one isn't all that different from any of the others, though it does look at things more from the business perspective. The argument is that Google's own service is cutting a bit too close to that of the companies it partners with, and it's also facing tough competition in the corporate search space. They also think that Google won't be able to keep up it's user-friendly policies once it goes public and short-term thinking shareholders start clamoring for better financial performance. I get the feeling that the media is making a bigger story out of all of this than there really is. I'm sure that some Google partners (Yahoo, specifically) are getting annoyed that Google is moving more and more into their space. However, it doesn't do them much good to ditch Google, when the alternatives really aren't that good. Perhaps, over time, they will get better, but right now they're just not there. If Yahoo wants to switch entirely to Inktomi's technology, it could backfire badly. If the search results are nowhere near as useful, they're practically handing over a percentage of their users to Google - losing all the ad revenue they're already taking in from people who do Yahoo searches. As for the issue of becoming less user-friendly after an IPO... it's certainly possible, though it'll be up to Google's management to convince investors that being user-friendly goes hand in hand with their success. Putting in more overbearing ads ruins the experience and will drive users elsewhere - defeating the whole purpose of putting the ads there in the first place.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
'Google' is primarily a business entity--
Google defenders seem to view Google as Howard Roark like protagonist. Google is not a character, but an institution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Google' is primarily a business entity--
However, it's been my experience that the Google experience works much better than any other search experience. The ads don't get in the way, the site is fast, and it finds stuff better than any other search engine I've tried. And, I do try the others quite freqently - but always return to Google.
So, I have no illusions about the "mystique" of Google. But, I do think that companies that ditch them without a credible solution are asking for trouble. I also think that their user-friendly nature is worth talking about. They've gone out of their way to make sure the user experience is worthwhile and enjoyable... rather than focusing on the short-term bottom line objectives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Google' is primarily a business entity--
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Google' is primarily a business entity--
I don't see what that has to do with any of the points that I made.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Google' is primarily a business entity--
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google IPO?
Is this a foregone conclusion. There's no requirement that a company, even a dot-com, must at some point go public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google IPO?
I, personally, a gree that not all companies need to go public. In fact, I think too many companies do go public when they shouldn't.
However, this is a venture backed startup with money from Kleiner Perkins and Sequoia. Those guys are in it for the money, and the big money comes from an IPO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]