SACD/DVD-Audio Fight Continues - Consumers Don't Care
from the why-bother dept
As the fight continues over who wins the next music disc format war, SACD or DVD-Audio, I begin to wonder why anyone cares at all? I'm reminded of the old urban myth that VHSs beat Betamax even though it was technically inferior. The truth is that VHS machines offered customers what they wanted. The quality was "good enough", and what they wanted was tapes that could record a full movie (Betamaxes could only record about an hour). Now, the music industry is betting that people want these new "enhanced" CDs, talking about the higher quality. While I have no doubt that many music fans will go for them, I imagine that many people will stay away for the simple reason that these enhanced audio CDs don't let people make use of their fair use rights. If you have one of these CDs, no matter how great the sound quality, don't expect to rip it into an MP3 (even if that's completely legal). So, the debate comes down to: is it worth the extra money (and they do cost more) to have an incompatible system that gives you less features, but better sound? In the VHS/Beta fight, people chose features over quality. Now we'll see if the same thing happens with enhanced CDs.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
VCR = VHS???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: VCR = VHS???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like, Duh!
I remember the CD switch: People chose CD because 1> it was smaller and 2> it was easier (didn't get scratchy right away). The "pure sound" -- that was OK, but not a reason really to switch (c'mon: otherwise why would you put up with a CD in a boom box?).
Nobody will find SACD "super" because it doesn't add anything of value to 99.9999% of listeners.
This SACD pitch, apart from control aspects, is just another case of technofacism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Like, Duh!
But you're right. Only a few audiophiles care about the sound quality. And half of them still think that LPs sounded better than CDs.
My worry is that consumers will be dragged unwillingly into this format (If you want the new CD by your favorite band, it's only available in SACD)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Like, Duh!
Remember: the PC industry is suffering because consumers are resisting the "shiny" pitch.
I suspect people just won't buy 'em when they find out that they won't work in the car/portable/whatever player.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
some SACDs can be copied (sortof)
It would seem they have caught on to the fact that they cannot stop the copying, but they make you pay to get the higher quality. Imho, this should have happened ages ago.
Geoff
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Selling points
[ link to this | view in chronology ]