Japanese Recording Industry Tracks Online Music Files

from the go-go-trackers dept

The Japanese equivalent of the RIAA announced today that they had successfully tracked "watermarked" digital music files that they surreptitiously put online. They say that using such a system would discourage people from downloading unauthorized music files, since those files could be tracked back to where they originated from. Of course, if such watermarks become widespread, it won't take long before people create ways to strip the watermark files from the songs.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    David, 30 Jan 2003 @ 6:24am

    Watermarking consequences

    If it were possible to watermark a sound file such that the removal of the watermark would seriously degrade the sound quality, then we might have a decent compromise for everyone. Labels could offer MP3s for download at reasonable/cheap prices, watermarking each file with a uniquely identifiable watermark. The consumer is allowed to make personal copies for his car CD player, his MP3 handheld player, his PC, etc. He can even make a copy for a friend... but he has to be pretty sure the friend won't start file-sharing it (and certainly the original purchaser shouldn't) because the file could be ultimately traced back to him through the watermark. No, it's not an ideal solution because file-sharing itself can be seen as a sort of promotion instead of piracy... but it IS a solution I think a lot of people could live with. The labels could be more confident in releasing tons of content inexpensively, and be more targetted in their lawsuits. The average consumer would flock to it, I believe.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.