Software In A Box

from the can't-sell-software dept

Bill Gurley seems to have returned from his writing exile, and is now explaining why many technology executives are realizing that hardware is a better business than software. He makes some interesting points - but misses the most important one. As he points out, software has a nearly zero variable cost - which means that if there's any competition, the price will get driven down towards zero. He mentions this briefly - but it's the most important point. Software, by itself, is difficult to productize, because if the environment ever gets truly competitive, you won't be able to sell it for any money. Instead, companies can take advantage of that zero marginal cost by using it (for free) to enhance the value of something else (the hardware). Suddenly it becomes a free input, making the hardware more valuable. It's just basic economics. Of course, the same applies for music and plenty of other digital goods, but those industries aren't quite ready to accept that yet.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    dorpus, 11 Feb 2003 @ 2:11pm

    Two points

    1. Proprietary in-house software is and probably always will be a labor-intensive, locally produced affair. Your cheap programmer in India will not know all the nuances of what people inside the company want; it takes many face-to-face meetings, trial-and-error, ongoing changes of design. Many vendors have come out with "enterprise management" software, but companies all have their nooks and crannies that are not satisfied by out-of-the-box packages.

    2. What about custom chips? A truly optimized computer system will have some of the software hard-wired into the system. There has been talk before of making custom chips for specific programming languages, or "chess calculators". Will we get to the point where it is easy to crank out custom chips, or is the complexity of modern chip design outpacing this?



    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      aNonMooseCowherd, 12 Feb 2003 @ 5:10pm

      Re: Two points

      Custom chips for Lisp computers died out years ago because they couldn't keep up with the general purpose CPU market.

      There is still a big market for specialized processors like DSPs (digital signal processors), which are not exactly ASICs but are designed for particular needs that are common to signal processing (like combined multiply-and-add instructions).

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.