Digital Entertainment Jumps The Border
from the sneaking-in-American-culture dept
Countries all over the world are apparently so afraid of American culture wiping out their own, that they have quotas on how much TV programming can come from foreign sources. This just seems silly to me. If the people want to watch American programming, then it really should be their choice. If these countries want people to watch homegrown productions, they should make better productions that are more appealing to their local population. New technology may be forcing this issue. As satellite TV, video-on-demand and (eventually) TV-via-internet start to catch on national broadcast quotas are becoming useless. On the flip side, though, cheaper digital production techniques mean it's easier and cheaper to create your own local content - so competing with American production studios isn't as difficult as it once was - so local competition may become much stronger. Anyway, do people in other countries really watch the crap we put on TV? Half the game shows/reality shows are stolen from the UK anyway, and most of the rest of primetime is completely forgettable these days as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
TV
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misrepresentation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brad's correct
And anyway, just because people will sit mindlessly in front of whatever ridiculously cheap drivel the US can produce, doesn't mean we shouldn't encourage local production of more worthy material. Otherwise we'd just broadcast a static picture of "dogs playing poker" :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
First, there is the economic argument others have made. Second, broadcasting all these hours of glamorous, rich, and materialistic lives does create a set of expectations that can't be met in most countries in this century, which then causes all kinds of problems as you have all these people aware that a much richer life is possible, but that they have no way of obtaining it. I think those conditions breed suicide bombers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I am not an expert in this area, but many countries that regulate US content are not in the category that you describe.
Here at least, the TV channels want to show US (and British, I might add) stuff because it is generally cheaper to re-run than to create and there are simply not a lot of Canadian shows. Also, us unwashed masses want to see the shows that others are talking about in the papers, on the Internet etc, and mostly don't care about whether the show is US, Canadian or something completely different. I think the second reason is a bigger reason than the first. For instance, I suspect that rebroadcasting Survivor costs more than a home-grown version would, especially because there are subsidies available for Canadian filmmakers, but a homegrown version would not stop viewers from wanting to also see the original.
The regulators insist of a certain percentage of Canadian content (and what is defined as Canadian content gets truly ridiculous) because they are afraid of culture dilution and the "brain drain" (losing our talent to the US because there are no good opportunities here). Of course, this is a massive oversimplification.
However, in my opinion, the regulation is excessive and does not accomplish its goal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]