Tales Of A Former Dot Commer Looking For Work
Survey Says: We Hate Spam

The Price Of Freeware Rises

Overhype

from the so-it-goes dept

Wed, Feb 12th 2003 2:18am — Mike Masnick
It ain't easy being free, these days. While it used to be simple to create a piece of software and put it up on any one of a number of download sites for "free software", the world is now changing (and charging). Plenty of download sites are now charging fees to either software developers or to downloaders. This makes it a tougher proposition if you want to give away free software. The worst offender may be a site called "Completely Free Software" that charges $5 a month to access its software. The download sites say they need to charge because advertising isn't paying the bandwidth bill any more. Of course, the main issue here is the costs of bandwidth for the developers (otherwise, why not just offer it on their own site?). There's a simple way around this, though, which is for someone to set up a P2P file sharing system that is focused on free software. People could write reviews and point others to the best free software products, and the bandwidth would be shared across everyone. Of course, how would people find out about this great P2P product if all the free download sites are now charging...
3 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    xdroop, 12 Feb 2003 @ 5:36am

    Uh... No.

    Let me get this straight -- I'm supposed to trust that the thingware-0.5.9b.tgz that I downloaded from some bozo out there is the real thingware-0.5.9b.tgz?

    The purpose of having authoritative download sites is so that you have a better confidence level that what you are getting is the real thing and not some trojaned thing.

    Untrustworthy sources are fine for data like music, movies, and pictures; but not for software.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 Feb 2003 @ 8:19am

      Re: Uh... No.

      That's silly. All you need from the authoritative source is sufficiently detailed checksum information to verify that the file you got is the file that was released. It's already common practice to release checksums for verifying file distributions; and for the less sophisticated users the check could be built into a P2P client designed for this purpose.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mark Easterling, 31 Mar 2009 @ 7:12pm

    Here is a solution.

    A possible solution would be to find a way to host everything for free by using services that are already in place for something else. Check out this guys blogger blog. http://grateware.blogspot.com It's pretty neat because he is using blogger to host his website pages ( they are static and never change, basically each program gets a single page blog) and then he links them all together with another blog. The main issue I saw with this strategy is file hosting, but this guy figured that out. He is hosting his files on Google Sites. So his project is totally hosted by Google for nothing. And when people click his google ads, he gets paid. Not a bad setup. you should take a look at it. I'm working on my own version of it right now for my freeware programs.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]


Tales Of A Former Dot Commer Looking For Work
Survey Says: We Hate Spam
Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

Friday

19:39 Important Announcement: Techdirt Is Migrating To A New Platform (0)
More arrow

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.