Telcos Out To Silence Net Phone Calls
from the growing-threat dept
The phone companies have shown an amazing ability to avoid offering real new services to their customers until they're absolutely forced to. When competitors come along, they've used their monopoly powers or political clout to change the rules to get their wishes. This article suggests the Bells are about to do the same thing to voice-over-IP calls, since they're finally realizing that they present a real competitive threat. This is, yet again, another clear case of companies not understanding how disruptive technologies work. VoIP is a classic example of a disruptive technology - cheaper, but it starts off not nearly good enough to match the incumbent offerings, so the major players ignore it. However, it's getting better over time, and is basically at the point where it's "good enough" for many users. So, now the Bells want to block out the VoIP players. In doing so, they're (like so many other companies) trying to shut down a "competitive" technology without realizing the opportunities it presents. The Bells see it as an alternative way to use the telephone, when, in reality, VoIP changes the very nature of what you can do with the telephone. It puts the smarts into the network so that anyone can add additional features instead of being forced to go through approved services hosted by the Bells themselves (see why they're upset about it?). But, what the Bells refuse to see, is that by making the telephone smarter and more useful, they open up more opportunities for themselves (and others), if they would just figure out how to capitalize on them. Instead, they're futzing around trying to figure out ways to slow down VoIP providers - while those VoIP providers figure out how to give consumers a better service. Update: In somewhat related news, the Internet Home Alliance has come out with a report telling technology companies they need to innovate or die. They say most companies focus on their traditional businesses, and miss the opportunities that come along. Seems to fit with what I said above.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bell's opportunities
------------------------------------
Bells don't deploy new opportunities proactively. They only deploy new stuff defensively.
The new capabilities you speak of are mostly end-point-based. Bells rely on central control and on being a non-bypassable middleman. There is no reasonable way for them to capitalize on end-point-based capabilities short of blocking their passage through their network, and only allowing them to pass if you pay a toll to the gatekeeper. That no-value-add mark-up would kill the value of the new capability.
They don't refuse to see it. They see it exactly for what it is--something that makes their monopoly services irrelevant, and makes obvious that their services are highly constrictive to innovations and hugely overpriced.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bell's opportunities
Sure, it erodes their current business model, but that happens no matter what. Shouldn't they be positioning themselves to take advantage of it, rather than waiting to be proven obsolete?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bell's opportunities
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bell's opportunities
Do you think this is inevitable for the bells to get into VoIP/SIP etc... that may potentially offer new services? But the question is what are these NEW opportunities with VoIP? Is it better to innovate from scratch wiht VoIP or innovate on top of the old PSTN network which may be good money after bad?
At least a counterstrategy to cable is get into their core business of video/tv etc..but to attack vonage is tricky coz all they have is the phone service.
Lobbying with the regulators will only buy them time and also impede on their own innovations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]