No One Buys Film Cameras Any More

from the getting-beaten-on-both-ends dept

It seems that the trusty old point-and-shoot film camera is finally becoming obsolete. It's being attacked on both sides. On the low-end, one time use disposable cameras are gaining a bigger share, and at the high end, it's all about digital cameras. Of course, the disposables still use film, so it's not as if film is going away right now, but more and more people don't see a compelling reason to buy a permanent film-based camera for their snapshots.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Richard Jones, 27 Feb 2003 @ 5:04pm

    This is funny..

    I read an article just last week that said that print photography wasn't going anywhere. Sure, there's some migration from print to digital, but it's nothing even close to being the death of print. I suspect the PMAI may have a vested interest in spinning the story this way...

    Anyway: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/02/21/1045638480193.html

    IMHO, the quality of mid-price-range digital cameras still have nothing on that of print cameras. Most photo labs offer a film scanning service for next to nothing. And cheap digital cameras are just not worth buying, they're so terrible. I'll still be using print until the mid-price-range digital cameras can come close to the quality of print.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Duffman, 28 Feb 2003 @ 7:53am

      Re: This is funny..

      I still use my old point-and-click camera. I prefer using it, actually. For me (and a lot of amateur and professional photographers), there's something missing in a digital camera. On the other hand, there are those who exclusively use a digital camera. I myself have taken beautiful photos with both, and I wouldn't give either up, and while I would say the point-and-click camera market is thriving, it is far from dead, or even dying.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.