Content Lives On
from the can't-get-rid-of-it... dept
It seems that the US government is learning a lesson that the music industry is still trying to get their heads around. Once content is online... it doesn't go away. So, even as the government start seizing domain names, that doesn't mean they stop the content from existing. For example, the big story this week was how the government seized the domain for ISONews.com. But, all they did was redirect the domain name - meaning the content lived on. For a while, people were still going there by going directly to the old IP address, but now someone has setup a new domain for it with the creative name "stolemy.com". I wonder how long until the government seizes that domain as well. How many domains do they need to seize before they should realize that content itself shouldn't be illegal...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But
Hijacking [the domains] without due process is a bad precedent and is not tolerated elsewhere!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
maybe it's been removed already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]